551 CONGO ST, 94131

See Also:   Information for the County of San Francisco
(Elections Office, local League of Women Voters, links to other county election sites)

California Supreme Court (Yes/No)

• Leondra R. Kruger
  72.8% Yes (6,698,643) 27.2% No (2,506,418)
• Carol A. Corrigan
  69.8% Yes (6,539,085) 30.2% No (2,833,205)

Justice, California State Court of Appeal; District 1, Division 1 (Yes/No)

• James M. Humes
  76.7% Yes (1,183,965) 23.3% No (359,554)
• Sandra Margulies
  74.5% Yes (1,161,187) 25.5% No (396,639)

Justice, California State Court of Appeal; District 1, Division 2 (Yes/No)

• Marla Miller
  73.5% Yes (1,130,781) 26.5% No (408,027)
• James A. Richman
  66.4% Yes (1,006,555) 33.6% No (509,662)

Justice, California State Court of Appeal; District 1, Division 3 (Yes/No)

• Peter John Siggins
  75.6% Yes (1,137,347) 24.4% No (366,164)

Justice, California State Court of Appeal; District 1, Division 4 (Yes/No)

• Alison M. Tucher
  81.5% Yes (1,243,752) 18.5% No (281,909)
• Jon B. Streeter
  76.4% Yes (1,145,604) 23.6% No (353,804)

Justice, California State Court of Appeal; District 1, Division 5 (Yes/No)

• Barbara Jones
  82.9% Yes (1,267,452) 17.1% No (261,702)

Federal

United States Senator

• Dianne Feinstein, Democratic
  6,019,422 votes 54.2%
• Kevin De León, Democratic
  5,093,942 votes 45.8%

United States Representative; District 12

• Nancy Pelosi, Democratic
  275,292 votes 86.8%
• Lisa Remmer, Republican
  41,780 votes 13.2%

Member of the State Assembly; District 17

• David Chiu, Democratic
  140,381 votes 75.5%
• Alejandro Fernandez, Democratic
  45,483 votes 24.5%

Governor

• Gavin Newsom, Democratic
  7,721,410 votes 61.9%
• John H. Cox, Republican
  4,742,825 votes 38.1%

Lieutenant Governor

• Eleni Kounalakis, Democratic
  5,914,068 votes 56.6%
• Ed Hernandez, Democratic
  4,543,863 votes 43.4%

Secretary of State

• Alex Padilla, Democratic
  7,909,521 votes 64.5%
• Mark P. Meuser, Republican
  4,362,545 votes 35.5%

Controller

• Betty T. Yee, Democratic
  8,013,067 votes 65.5%
• Konstantinos Roditis, Republican
  4,229,480 votes 34.5%

Treasurer

• Fiona Ma, Democratic
  7,825,587 votes 64.1%
• Greg Conlon, Republican
  4,376,816 votes 35.9%

Attorney General

• Xavier Becerra, Democratic
  7,790,743 votes 63.6%
• Steven C. Bailey, Republican
  4,465,587 votes 36.4%

Insurance Commissioner

• Ricardo Lara, Democratic
  6,186,039 votes 52.9%
• Steve Poizner, No Party Preference
  5,515,293 votes 47.1%

State Board of Equalization; District 2

• Malia Cohen, Democratic
  2,482,171 votes 72.8%
• Mark Burns, Republican
  927,949 votes 27.2%

School

State Superintendent of Public Instruction

• Tony K. Thurmond
  5,385,912 votes 50.9%
• Marshall Tuck
  5,198,738 votes 49.1%

Member, Board of Education; City of San Francisco (3 Elected)

• Alison Collins
  122,865 votes 15.02%
• Gabriela Lopez
  112,299 votes 13.73%
• Faauuga Moliga
  107,989 votes 13.2%
• Phil Kim
  76,017 votes 9.29%
• Michelle Parker
  65,740 votes 8.04%
• Li Miao Lovett
  61,412 votes 7.51%
• John D. Trasviña
  46,601 votes 5.7%
• Alida Fisher
  37,735 votes 4.61%
• Monica Chinchilla
  34,193 votes 4.18%
• Lenette Thompson
  30,496 votes 3.73%
• Josephine Zhao
  27,761 votes 3.39%
• Mia Satya
  17,540 votes 2.14%
• Paul Kangas
  13,967 votes 1.71%
• Darron Padilla
  12,950 votes 1.58%
• Martin Rawlings-Fein
  12,439 votes 1.52%
• Connor Krone
  12,251 votes 1.5%
• Roger Sinasohn
  12,018 votes 1.47%
• Lex Leifheit
  9,605 votes 1.17%
• Phillip House
  2,491 votes 0.3%
• (1,551 Total Other Write-In Votes 0.19%)

Member, Community College Board; City of San Francisco (3 Elected)

• Brigitte Davila
  187,792 votes 29.91%
• Thea Selby
  184,956 votes 29.46%
• John Rizzo
  151,356 votes 24.11%
• Victor Olivieri
  101,368 votes 16.15%
• (2,373 Total Other Write-In Votes 0.38%)

City and County

Assessor-Recorder; City of San Francisco
First ranked choice applies

• Carmen Chu
  235,187 votes 74.4%
• Paul Bellar
  79,674 votes 25.2%
• (1,255 Total Other Write-In Votes 0.4%)

Public Defender; City of San Francisco
First ranked choice applies

• Jeff Adachi
  286,688 votes 98.4%
• (4,670 Total Other Write-In Votes 1.6%)

Proposition 1 Authorizes Bonds to Fund Specified Housing Assistance Programs
Pass: 6,751,018 / 56.2% Yes votes ...... 5,258,157 / 43.8% No votes

Authorizes $4 billion in general obligation bonds for existing affordable housing programs for low-income residents, veterans, farmworkers, manufactured and mobile homes, infill, and transit-oriented housing. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs to repay bonds averaging about $170 million annually over the next 35 years.

Proposition 2 Authorizes Bonds to Fund Existing Housing Program for Individuals with Mental Illness
Pass: 7,662,528 / 63.4% Yes votes ...... 4,417,327 / 36.6% No votes

Amends Mental Health Services Act to fund No Place Like Home Program, which finances housing for individuals with mental illness. Ratifies existing law establishing the No Place Like Home Program. Fiscal Impact: Allows the state to use up to $140 million per year of county mental health funds to repay up to $2 billion in bonds. These bonds would fund housing for those with mental illness who are homeless.

Proposition 3 Authorizes Bonds To Fund Projects for Water Supply and Quality, Watershed, Fish, Wildlife, Water Conveyance, and Groundwater Sustainability and Storage
Fail: 5,879,836 / 49.3% Yes votes ...... 6,034,991 / 50.7% No votes

Authorizes $8.877 billion in state general obligation bonds for various infrastructure projects. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs to repay bonds averaging $430 million per year over 40 years. Local government savings for water-related projects, likely averaging a couple hundred million dollars annually over the next few decades.

Proposition 4 Authorizes Bonds Funding Construction at Hospitals Providing Children's Health Care
Pass: 7,551,298 / 62.7% Yes votes ...... 4,494,143 / 37.3% No votes

Authorizes $1.5 billion in bonds, to be repaid from state's General Fund, to fund grants for construction, expansion, renovation, and equipping of qualifying children's hospitals. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs to repay bonds averaging about $80 million annually over the next 35 years.

Proposition 5 Changes Requirements For Certain Property Owners to Transfer Their Property Tax Base to Replacement Property
Fail: 4,813,251 / 40.2% Yes votes ...... 7,152,993 / 59.8% No votes

Removes certain transfer requirements for homeowners over 55, severely disabled homeowners, and contaminated or disaster-destroyed property. Fiscal Impact: Schools and local governments each would lose over $100 million in annual property taxes early on, growing to about $1 billion per year. Similar increase in state costs to backfill school property tax losses.

Proposition 6 Eliminates Certain Road Repair and Transportation Funding. Requires Certain Fuel Taxes and Vehicle Fees Be Approved By the Electorate
Fail: 5,283,222 / 43.2% Yes votes ...... 6,952,081 / 56.8% No votes

Repeals a 2017 transportation law's taxes and fees designated for road repairs and public transportation. Fiscal Impact: Reduced ongoing revenues of $5.1 billion from state fuel and vehicle taxes that mainly would have paid for highway and road maintenance and repairs, as well as transit programs.

Proposition 7 Confirms California Daylight Saving Time to Federal Law. Allows Legislature to Change Daylight Saving Time Period
Pass: 7,167,315 / 59.7% Yes votes ...... 4,828,564 / 40.3% No votes

Gives Legislature ability to change daylight saving time period by two-thirds vote, if changes are consistent with federal law. Fiscal Impact: This measure has no direct fiscal effect because changes to daylight saving time would depend on future actions by the Legislature and potentially the federal government.

Proposition 8 Regulates Amounts Outpatient Kindney Dialysis Clinics Charge For Dialysis Treatment
Fail: 4,845,264 / 40.1% Yes votes ...... 7,247,917 / 59.9% No votes

Requires rebates and penalties if charges exceed limit. Requires annual reporting to the state. Prohibits clinics from refusing to treat patients based on payment source. Fiscal Impact: Overall annual effect on state and local governments ranging from net positive impact in the low tens of millions of dollars to net negative impact in the tens of millions of dollars.

Proposition 10 Expands Local Governments' Authority to Enact Rent Control
Fail: 4,949,543 / 40.6% Yes votes ...... 7,251,443 / 59.4% No votes

Repeals state law that currently restricts the scope of rent-control policies that cities and other local jurisdictions may impose on residential property. Fiscal Impact: Potential net reduction in state and local revenues of tens of millions of dollars per year in the long term. Depending on actions by local communities, revenue losses could be less or considerably more.

Proposition 11 Requires Private-Sector Emergency Ambulance Employees to Remain On-Call During Work Breaks. Eliminates Certain Employer Liability
Pass: 7,181,116 / 59.6% Yes votes ...... 4,861,831 / 40.4% No votes

Law entitling hourly employees to breaks without being on-call would not apply to private-sector ambulance employees. Fiscal Impact: Likely fiscal benefit to local governments (in the form of lower costs and higher revenues), potentially in the tens of millions of dollars each year.

Proposition 12 Establishes New Standards For Confinement of Specified Farm Animals; Bans Sale of Noncomplying Products
Pass: 7,551,434 / 62.7% Yes votes ...... 4,499,702 / 37.3% No votes

Establishes minimum requirements for confining certain farm animals. Prohibits sales of meat and egg products from animals confined in noncomplying manner. Fiscal Impact: Potential decrease in state income tax revenues from farm businesses, likely not more than several million dollars annually. State costs up to $10 million annually to enforce the measure.

Proposition A Embarcadero Seawall Earthquake Safety Bond -- City and County of San Francisco (2/3 Approval Required)
Pass: 288,146 / 82.7% Yes votes ...... 60,276 / 17.3% No votes

To protect the waterfront, BART and Muni, buildings, historic piers, and roads from earthquakes, flooding and rising seas by: repairing the 100 year old Embarcadero Seawall; strengthening the Embarcadero; and fortifying transit infrastructure and utilities serving residents and businesses; shall the city issue $425,000,000 in bonds, with a duration up to 30 years from the time of issuance, an estimated tax rate of $0.013/$100 of assessed property value, and estimated annual revenues of up to $40,000,000, with citizen oversight and regular audits?

Proposition B City Privacy Guidelines -- City and County of San Francisco (Majority Approval Required)
Pass: 186,758 / 57.58% Yes votes ...... 137,592 / 42.42% No votes

Shall the City amend the Charter to include privacy guidelines and require the City Administrator to propose a privacy ordinance consistent with the guidelines to the Board of Supervisors?

Proposition C Additional Business Taxes to Fund Homeless Services -- City and County of San Francisco (Majority Approval Required)
Pass: 215,491 / 61.34% Yes votes ...... 135,835 / 38.66% No votes

Shall the City impose additional business taxes to create a dedicated fund to support services for homeless people and prevent homelessness, including one tax of 0.175% to 0.69% on gross receipts over $50 million that a business receives in San Francisco, and another tax of 1.5% on certain administrative offices' payroll expense in San Francisco, raising an estimated $250-300 million in combined tax revenues annually, and with no expiration date for these taxes?

Proposition D Additional Tax on Cannabis Businesses -- City and County of San Francisco (Majority Approval Required)
Pass: 227,250 / 65.67% Yes votes ...... 118,815 / 34.33% No votes

Shall the City impose new cannabis business taxes beginning in 2021, at rates ranging from 1% to 5% on gross receipts of cannabis businesses in San Francisco, where the Board of Supervisors could decrease those rates, or increase them up to 7%; and shall the City apply many of its business taxes to businesses with over $500,000 in gross receipts in San Francisco that do not have a physical presence here; raising an estimated $2-4 million annually in combined tax revenues in 2019 and 2020, and an estimated $7-16 million annually beginning in 2021, and with no expiration date on these newly imposed and applied taxes?

Proposition E Partial Allocation of Hotel Tax for Arts and Cultural Purposes -- City and County of San Francisco (Majority Approval Required)
Pass: 258,343 / 75.12% Yes votes ...... 85,585 / 24.88% No votes

Shall the City annually distribute up to 1.5% of the current base hotel tax for specific arts and cultural purposes, without increasing the existing hotel tax?