This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sbo/ for current information.
San Bernardino, Riverside County, CA November 4, 2014 Election
Smart Voter

Research on imported water sales and property tax authority

By Susan Longville

Candidate for Member, Board of Directors; San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District; Division 3

This information is provided by the candidate
RESEARCH ON IMPORTED WATER SALES BETWEEN 2010-2013: Annual reports from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California were utilized to determine the extent that the sale of imported water by Valley District may have contributed to low basin levels. Attempts to find public information about water sales on Valley District's website were unsuccessful.
1. The MWDSC 2013 Annual Report shows that (http://www.mwdh2o.com/mwdh2o/pages/about/ar/ar13.html) Metropolitan received 20,000 AF of minimum purchase water and 30,000 AF from Valley District.
2. The MWDSC 2012 Annual Report shows that (http://www.mwdh2o.com/mwdh2o/pages/about/AR/AR12.html) Metropolitan purchased 20,000 AF" from Valley District.
3.The MWDSC 2011 Annual Report shows that (http://www.mwdh2o.com/mwdh2o/pages/about/ar/ar11.html) Metropolitan purchased and took delivery of 20,000 AF" from Valley District.

In the ten years between 2003 and 2012, the California Department of Water Resources reports that Valley District purchased just under 470,000 acre-feet of imported water from the State Water Project. (http://www.water.ca.gov/news/newsreleases/2013/121013drr2013_report.pdf).

SUMMARY: Between 2010-2013, in the midst of a drought and dropping water levels in local basins, Valley District sold 90,000 acre-feet of imported water (29 billion gallons). In fact, in the last seven years, Valley District sold a whopping 25% of all the imported water it bought to MWD. There is no doubt that the sale of water has in part contributed to the basin levels 550,000 acre-feet below the level considered full-- beneath the historic low of 1964 before any imported water became available.

PROPERTY TAX RESEARCH: Property owners within Valley District's boundaries pay property taxes based on assessed value. The current rate is $0.1625 per $100 of assessed value. For the sake of illustration, a median-priced home assessed at $250,000 last year paid $406.25 (250,000 divided by 100=2500 x $0.1625 = $406.25).

Valley District is exempt from Prop 13, passed in 1978, because State Water Project taxing authority was granted in 1960. It has the authority to raise taxes without a vote of the people for costs associated with the State Water Project.

What will happen to property taxes when construction begins of the proposed twin-tunnels in the Delta, the Bay Delta Conservation Plan solution? A final decision is expected next year.

Should Valley District increase property taxes, without a vote of the people, because it legally can and this is the manner that ratepayers have always paid for the State Water Project?

SUMMARY: There should be a vote of the people with Valley District for ratepayers to decide how they want to pay for the twin-tunnels. Let them decide whether higher property taxes or higher wholesale water costs are right. It's only fair since this is the most expensive water project in the State's history and it will be paid for by generations to come.

Candidate Page || Feedback to Candidate || This Contest
November 2014 Home (Ballot Lookup) || About Smart Voter


ca/sbo Created from information supplied by the candidate: October 10, 2014 16:29
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.