This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/bt/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund If you appreciate our service to voters, please consider helping us with a donation.
Smart Voter
Butte County, CA June 5, 2012 Election
Measure A
Medical Marijuana Cultivation Ordinance Referendum
County of Butte

Majority Approval Required

Fail: 22318 / 45.35% Yes votes ...... 26892 / 54.65% No votes

See Also: Index of all Measures

Results as of Jun 20 4:05pm, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (143/143)
Information shown below: Fiscal Impact | Official Information | Impartial Analysis | Arguments | Full Text

Shall the Medical Marijuana Cultivation Ordinance, Ordinance Number 4029, be adopted?

Fiscal Impact from Butte County Auditor-Controller:
The Butte County Auditor-Controller has prepared the following fiscal impact analysis of Measure "A" (Medical Marijuana Cultivation Ordinance) pursuant to Election Code Section 9160. This analysis of the resulting costs and revenues of the proposed measure is based on projected requirements to fulfill the intent of the measure.

Background:

  • Through passage of Proposition 215 in 1996, the voters of California authorized use of marijuana for medical purposes.
  • In 2004, the Legislature enacted Senate Bill 420 to clarify the scope of Proposition 215 and to provide qualifying patients and primary caregivers, who collectively or cooperatively cultivate marijuana for medical purposes, with a limited defense to certain specified state criminal statutes. Senate Bill 420 was codified as California Health and Safety Code sections 11362.7 et seq.
  • California Health and Safety Code section 11362.7 expressly allows cities and counties to adopt and to enforce ordinances consistent with Senate Bill 420.
  • In response, the Butte County Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance Number 4029, adding Chapter 34A of the Butte County Code, regulating the cultivation of medical marijuana in the unincorporated portions of Butte County. The intent of this Chapter is to establish reasonable regulation upon the manner in which marijuana may be cultivated in order to protect the public health, safety, welfare and environment in Butte County.

Fiscal Impact:

Under this measure, a permit is required to cultivate marijuana for the qualified individual. Revenue from fees related to the implementation of the Ordinance will be generated. The intent of the revenue is to offset the cost of administration of the program. The proposed fee for application and registration process is $127. The proposed one on-site inspection during growing season is $158. The fees have been determined based upon a cost recovery model to cover the costs. Estimate revenue in the amount of $7,125 to $14,250 (approximately 25 -50 permits) will be expected in the first year. The same amount of cost is projected. Although the goal for the fees is to cover the costs, the actual costs will be higher than the potential fees collected.

By adopting the regulations contained in the Ordinance, the county will achieve a significant reduction in harm caused or threatened by the unregulated cultivation of marijuana in the unincorporated area of Butte County. Potential savings to the County on the costs of incarcerating and supervising certain marijuana offenders is unknown.

s/ David A. Houser, Auditor-Controller

Official Sources of Information

Impartial Analysis from Butte County Counsel
The Butte County Counsel has prepared the following impartial analysis of Measure "A" pursuant to Elections Code Section 9160. This analysis is not an argument for or against the measure.

Analysis:

Measure "A" is a referendum on Ordinance 4029, the Medical Marijuana Cultivation Ordinance ("Ordinance"). The Butte County Board of Supervisors adopted the Ordinance on May 24, 2011. A referendum petition to either repeal the Ordinance or submit it to the voters received the required number of signatures. On November 22, 2011, the Butte County Board of Supervisors chose to submit the Ordinance to the voters.

The Ordinance adds Chapter 34A to the Butte County Code. It limits the number of marijuana plants that may be grown based on the size of the property: for 0.5 acres or less, none are allowed; between 0.5 and 1.5 acres, 12 total plants of which no more than 6 may be mature; between 1.5 and 20 acres, 24 total plants of which no more than 12 may be mature; between 20 and 80 acres, 48 total plants of which no more than 24 may be mature; between 80 and 160 acres, 72 total plants of which no more than 36 may be mature; and above 160 acres, 99 total plants.

The Ordinance requires marijuana plants to be set back from adjoining properties based on the size of the property on which they are grown: between 0.5 and 1.5 acres, 15 feet; between 1.5 and 20 acres, 100 feet; between 20 and 80 acres, 250 feet; between 80 and 160 acres, 500 feet; and above 160 acres, 700 feet. On properties above 1.5 acres, the setback may be reduced for irregularly shaped properties. If grown outdoors, plants must be 100 feet from a residence on an adjoining property, unless 12 total plants or less of which no more than 6 are mature are grown in which case the setback is 30 feet from a residence on an adjoining property. Plants may not be grown within 1,000 feet of a youth-oriented facility, school, park, church, or residential treatment facility.

The Ordinance requires individuals growing on properties larger than 1.5 acres to register, unless they are growing 12 total plants or less of which no more than 6 are mature. Registration information is received in confidence and may only be disclosed as required by law.

The Ordinance authorizes the collection of fees. It requires individuals growing marijuana plants to be Butte County residents. It requires a renter or lessee to have the owner's permission to grow marijuana. It requires the plants to be securely fenced in a way that conceals them and prevents public access to them. For properties greater than 20 acres, if the plants are not visible to the public, a fence is not required.

Violation of the Ordinance is a public nuisance which may be abated by enjoining the activity and imposing administrative penalties.

Measure "A" is being submitted to all County voters, including voters in the incorporated areas. If a majority of the votes cast on the measure are "Yes," the measure will be approved, and Ordinance 4029 will become effective. If a majority of the votes cast on the measure are "No," the measure will not be approved, and Ordinance 4029 will not become effective.

s/ Bruce S. Alpert

Butte County Counsel

The above statement is an impartial analysis of Measure " ". If you desire a copy of Ordinance 4029 which would become effective by the adoption of Measure "A,"please call the Butte County Elections Office at (530) 538-7761, or (800) 894-7761 from within Butte County, and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you, or a copy may be obtained by visiting the Butte County Elections Office, 25 County Center Drive, Suite 110, Oroville, CA 95965. You may also access the full text of Measure "A" and Ordinance 4029 on the county Web site at the following Web address: http://clerkrecorder.buttecounty.net.

Contact FOR Measure A:
Address: 137 Sterling Oaks Dr, Chico, 95928

Contact: Josh Cook

Telephone: 530-346-3883

Email: butteconcernedneighbors@gmail.com Website: http://www.yesona.info

Contact AGAINST Measure A:
Address: 330 Wall St #40, Chico, 95928

Contact: Robert W. MacKenzie

  News and Analysis

Chico News & Review

KNVN.com - NBC 24 Action News
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Measure A Arguments Against Measure A
Measure A puts common sense limits on Marijuana growing.

Like most counties in California, Butte County is struggling for compatibility and understanding of the complex "Medical Marijuana" issue. Some growers are using a loophole in the Medical Marijuana law to grow marijuana for commercial sales and in places where it causes conflict with their neighbors, businesses and schools.

The Butte County Board of Supervisors passed a marijuana growing ordinance to ensure that marijuana grows are not set up in residential neighborhoods or next to schools, youth centers or churches. It also establishes a buffer zone around your home to protect you from the foul odor, dust, noise and artificial lighting that is often part of growing marijuana.

This ordinance is really quite simple. It mandates marijuana growers to obey similar land use rules that farmers must adhere to. Measure A requires growers to grow their marijuana in a way that does not disturb their neighbors or prevent them from enjoying their property in a peaceful and quiet manner. Measure A is about creating some simple rules about where you may grow Marijuana and how you may grow it.

Measure A simply requires that marijuana growers follow the same rules and regulations that other farmers are required to abide by. For more information go to http://www.yesona.info.

s/ Perry Reniff, Former Sheriff
s/ Robinette Cook, 3rd Dist. Agricultural Association
s/ Tim Titus, Pradise Town Councilman
s/ Bill Connelly, Butte County Supervisor

Rebuttal to Arguments For
Reasonable restrictions on cultivation are fine, but Measure A goes overboard. Measure A is an effort to make growing medical cannabis difficult. Measure A would be the first Butte County ordinance which would require farmers to file their medical records with Butte County to grow a crop on any parcel of 1.5 acres or larger. Want to grow medical cannabis inside? Measure A would require that you build a greenhouse that requires a County building permit.

Measure A would be the first Butte County ordinance to authorize the Butte County Sheriff to conduct repeated warrantless trespasses to check for a medical cannabis grow on your private property.

Measure A would prohibit growing medical cannabis on any parcel of .5 acre or less. That's most of the parcels in Butte County. Measure A will penalize disabled and low-income patients.

Butte County wants you to think that all medical cannabis gardens are a nuisance, in order to scare you. Butte County has an existing nuisance ordinance which is more than adequate to address any medical cannabis grow which becomes a nuisance. Under Butte County's existing nuisance ordinance, only a 72-hour notice need be given before Butte County can take action.

Don't buy Butte County's fear campaign. More code enforcement costs more money. Now is not the time to divert our scarce law enforcement resources to regulate medical cannabis grows. Will we need to close more libraries to police medical cannabis? Send Butte County back to the drawing board. We deserve better. For more information, go to http://www.ccubuttecounty.com

s/ Robert W. MacKenzie
s/ Andy Holcombe, Chico City Councilman
s/ Philip Seals, Disabled American combat Veteran
s/ Raymond J. Diepenbrock, Disabled American Combat Veteran

Measure A would drastically cut back your private property rights, by authorizing police to trespass on your land. Butte County has already banned medical cannabis dispensaries. Medical cannabis patients only have limited options: grow your own, have a caregiver grow it for you, or join a collective. Measure A would ban the cultivation of medical cannabis on parcels of V2 acre and smaller.

Cannabis provides undeniable medical benefits to a large number of people. Scientific research has proven cannabinoids effective in limiting the growth of and in shrinking cancerous tumors, staving off Alzheimer's, reducing pain, treating weight loss associated with AIDS, and reducing the nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy. In 2009, the American Medical Association stated that cannabis has medical benefits and requested that the federal government reclassify cannabis, to promote more scientific research. Many people with serious illnesses cannot tolerate prescription drug side effects.

Measure A would prevent many qualified patients from legally obtaining the medication they need, forcing them to buy their medicine on the black market. This would simply enrich the foreign drug cartels which grow marijuana on public land.

Measure A would authorize the Sheriffs Office to conduct repeated warrantless trespasses to check for a medical cannabis grow on your private property. To grow medical cannabis on a 1.5 acre parcel or greater, you would have to file a copy with Butte County of every medical card for every patient for whom you grow cannabis and every caregiver who tends cannabis plants on your property. Why should anyone have to file their medical records with Butte County?

Say No to more government intrusion. Don't let Butte County limit your health care options. Protect your current right to grow medical cannabis on your land for you and your family. VoteNo on Measure A.

s/ Robert W. MacKenzie

Rebuttal to Arguments Against
Measure A is not about stopping people with medical marijuana recommendations from using medicinal marijuana within the parameters of the law.

Measure A protects you from the noise, dust, lights, offensive odors and other negative impacts caused by the growing of marijuana in residential neighborhoods.

Many families have had their summertime ruined by the offensive smell of a full scale marijuana grow located within their neighborhoods. They asked for help and the Board of Supervisors responded in a fashion which balances the scale and is fair to everyone. Measure A sets up some simple rules to help people to be good neighbors.

While most growers are good neighbors, there are people abusing the system and disrupting the lives of other people living in their neighborhoods by growing marijuana in a location that is simply not appropriate for growing activity.

Measure A does not require marijuana growers to provide medical information to the county. Doctor/Patient privilege is covered and Measure A will not in any way compromise that relationship.

People with medical marijuana recommendations will still have access to medicinal marijuana. This measure is not about whether or not marijuana is legal; it's about protecting the rights of everyone.

Be a good neighbor and vote yes on Measure A. For more information go to http://www.yesona.info.

s/ Angela M. Thompson, Vice Mayor, Biggs, March23,2012

Full Text of Measure A
Resolution No. 11-125

RESOLUTION ORDERING THAT THE MEDICAL MARIJUANA CULTIVATION ORDINANCE BE SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT THE JUNE 5, 2012 ELECTION

WHEREAS, the Butte County Board of Supervisors has adopted Ordinance Number 4029, adding Chapter 34A of the Butte County Code regulating the cultivation of medical marijuana in the unincorporated portions of Butte County; and

WHEREAS, said Medical Marijuana Cultivation Ordinance was challenged on June 22, 2011 by a petition protesting it pursuant to Elections Code Section 9144; and

WHEREAS, the Butte County Clerk-Recorder/Registrar of Voters certified on July 27, 2011 that the petition had been found sufficient; and

WHEREAS, on August 9, 2011, the Board approved submitting said Medical Marijuana Cultivation Ordinance to the voters of the County at the next regularly scheduled county election.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, as follows:

1. The Board hereby submits the Medical Marijuana Cultivation Ordinance to the voters at the next regularly scheduled county election on June 5, 2012;

2. The question to be submitted to the County voters at said election shall be: Shall the Medical Marijuana Cultivation Ordinance, Ordinance Number 4029, be adopted?

3. Said election shall be consolidated with the statewide primary election to be held on June 5, 2012;

4. Said election shall be held and conducted pursuant to the procedures specified in Part 3 of Division 10 of the Elections Code commencing at Section 10400;

5. For purposes of this election, and Ordinance Number 4029, the "County voters" and the "County electorate" shall include all voters in the County, including voters in the incorporated areas of the County; and

6. In accordance with Elections Code Section 13120, the question to be submitted to the voters shall read as follows:

MEDICAL MARIJUANA CULTIVATION ORDINANCE REFERENDUM

Shall-the Medical Marijuana Cultivation Ordinance, Ordinance Number 4029, be adopted?

YES [ ]
NO [ ]

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, on the 22nd day of November, 2011, by the following votes:

AYES: Supervisors Connelly, Wahl, Kirk, Yamaguchi and Chair Lambert
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
NOT VOTING: None

s/ STEVE LAMBERT, Chair Butte County Board of Supervisors

ATTESTED:

s/ PAUL HAHN, Deputy Chief Administrative Officer and the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors

Ordinance No. 4029

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE ADDING ARTICLE I, ENTITLED "MEDICAL MARIJUANA CULTIVATION," OF CHAPTER 34A, ENTITLED "MEDICAL MARIJUANA CULTIVATION," OF THE BUTTE COUNTY CODE The Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte ordains as follows: Section 1. Chapter 34A is added to the Butte County Code as follows:

CHAPTER 34A MEDICAL MARIJUANA CULTIVATION REGULATION

34A-1 Authority and Title. Pursuant to the authority granted by Article XI, section 7 of the California Constitution, Health and Safety Code sections 11362.83 and 11362.768(f), and Government Code section 25845, the Board of Supervisors does enact this Chapter, which shall be known and may be cited as the "Butte County Medical Marijuana Cultivation Ordinance."

34A-2 Findings and Purpose.

(a) In 1996, the voters of the State of California approved Proposition 215 (codified as California Health and Safety Code section 11362.5, and entitled "The Compassionate Use Act of 1996").

(b) The intent of Proposition 215 was to enable persons who are in need of marijuana for medical purposes to use it without fear of criminal prosecution under limited, specified circumstances. The Proposition further provides that "nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede legislation prohibiting persons from engaging in conduct that endangers others, or to condone the diversion of marijuana for non-medical purposes." The ballot arguments supporting Proposition 215 expressly acknowledged that "Proposition 215 does not allow unlimited quantities of marijuana to be grown anywhere."

(c) In 2004, the Legislature enacted Senate Bill 420 (codified as California Health and Safety Code sections 11362.7 et seq.) to clarify the scope of Proposition 215, and to provide qualifying patients and primary caregivers who collectively or cooperatively cultivate marijuana for medical purposes with a limited defense to certain specified State criminal statutes.

(d) Health and Safety Code section 11362.83 expressly allows Cities and Counties to adopt and enforce ordinances that are consistent with Senate Bill 420.

(e) The Federal Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801 et seq., classifies marijuana as a Schedule I Drug, which is defined as a drug or other substance that has a high potential for abuse, that has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and that has not been accepted as safe for use under medical supervision. The Federal Controlled Substances Act makes it unlawful, under federal law, for any person to cultivate, manufacture, distribute or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute or dispense, marijuana. The Federal Controlled Substances Act contains no exemption for the cultivation, manufacture, distribution, dispensation, or possession of marijuana for medical purposes.

(f) The County's geographic and climatic conditions, which include dense forested areas receiving substantial precipitation, along with the sparse population in many areas of the County, provide conditions that are favorable to outdoor marijuana cultivation. Outdoor marijuana growers can achieve a high per-plant yield because of the County's favorable growing conditions. The federal Drug Enforcement Administration reports that various types of marijuana plants under various planting conditions may yield averages of 236 grams, or about one-half pound, to 846 grams, or nearly two pounds. Based on Butte County Sheriff's seizures, yields in Butte County have tended to be beyond this range with three to four pounds of dried "bud" per plant being common. The "street value" of a single cannabis plant is substantial. Pound prices for domestically produced high-grade cannabis sold illegally within Northern California can range between $1,500 to $3,000. A single marijuana plant cultivated within the County can thus easily yield $4,000 or more in salable marijuana.

(g) Proposition 215 and Senate Bill 420 primarily address the criminal law, providing qualifying patients and primary caregivers with limited immunity from state criminal prosecution under certain identified statutes. Neither Proposition 215 nor Senate Bill 420, nor the Attorney General's August 2008 Guidelines for the Security and Non-Diversion of Marijuana Grown for Medical Use adopted pursuant to Senate Bill 420, provides comprehensive civil regulation of premises used for marijuana cultivation. The unregulated cultivation of marijuana in the unincorporated area of Butte County can adversely affect the health, safety, and well-being of the County, its residents and environment. Comprehensive civil regulation of premises used for marijuana cultivation is proper and necessary to avoid the risks of criminal activity, degradation of the natural environment, malodorous smells, and indoor electrical fire hazards that may result from unregulated marijuana cultivation, and that are especially significant if the amount of marijuana cultivated on a single premises is not regulated and substantial amounts of marijuana are thereby allowed to be concentrated in one place.

(h) Cultivation of marijuana at locations or premises within one thousand (1,000) feet of schools, school bus stops, school evacuation sites, churches, parks, child care centers, or youth- oriented facilities creates unique risks that the marijuana plants may be observed by juveniles, and therefore be especially vulnerable to theft or recreational consumption by juveniles. Further, the potential for criminal activities associated with marijuana cultivation in such locations poses heightened risks that juveniles will be involved or endangered, therefore, cultivation of any amount of marijuana in such locations or premises is especially hazardous to public safety and welfare, and to the protection of children and the person(s) cultivating the marijuana plants.

(i) Public meetings regarding this ordinance were well-attended by hundreds of Butte County residents. Many residents who live on smaller parcels in more densely populated areas indicated that during the marijuana cultivation season, the overpowering unpleasant smell of marijuana resulted in their inability to use their yards and required them to keep windows and doors shut in the stifling summer heat. Residents stated that they could not invite friends to their home to visit, barbecue outdoors or even allow their children to play in the backyard. Other residents indicated that the use of a swamp cooler during the summer months would actually result in the stench of marijuana being sucked into the residence. Adults and children with respiratory problems were particularly affected. Residents reported that marijuana grown in residential backyards results in an invitation to criminal activity for persons who would steal marijuana plants out of backyards. Some marijuana growers would live in a tent in their backyard, carrying firearms and utilizing guard dogs to protect their marijuana plants. Residents reported they were uncomfortable allowing their children to play outside in their neighborhood due to such dangerous activity. Cultivators of medical marijuana stated that they would not grow medical marijuana at their own residence to protect their children. For this reason, the growth of medical marijuana on smaller parcels is especially dangerous to the community, particularly children. For the public safety and welfare, and to protect children, this ordinance prohibits the cultivation of marijuana on parcels smaller than one half (0.5) of an acre.

(j) As recognized by the Attorney General's August 2008 Guidelines for the Security and Non-Diversion of Marijuana Grown for Medical Use, the cultivation or other concentration of marijuana in any location or premises without adequate security increases the risk that surrounding homes or businesses may be negatively impacted by nuisance activity such as loitering or crime. The Butte County District Attorney's Office has indicated that seven of fifteen homicides in the County last year involved drivers with marijuana in their system and four of the seven victims were killed by alleged marijuana traffickers. The Butte County Sheriff's Office has indicated that over 150 calls for service in the past year have involved marijuana, including assaults and an attempted homicide.

(k) It is the purpose and intent of this Chapter to implement State law by providing a means for regulating the cultivation of medical marijuana in a manner that is consistent with State law and which balances the needs of medical patients and their caregivers and promotes the health, safety, and welfare of the residents and businesses within the unincorporated territory of the County of Butte. This Chapter is intended to be consistent with Proposition 215 and Senate Bill 420, and towards that end, is not intended to prohibit persons from individually, collectively, or cooperatively exercising any right otherwise granted by State law. Rather, the intent and purpose of this Chapter is to establish reasonable regulations upon the manner in which marijuana may be cultivated, including restrictions on the amount of marijuana that may be individually, collectively, or cooperatively cultivated in any location or premises, in order to protect the public health, safety, welfare and environment in Butte County.

(l) The limited right of qualified patients and their primary caregivers under State law to cultivate marijuana plants for medical purposes does not confer the right to create or maintain a public nuisance. By adopting the regulations contained in this Chapter, the County will achieve a significant reduction in the aforementioned harms caused or threatened by the unregulated cultivation of marijuana in the unincorporated area of Butte County.

(m) Nothing in this Chapter shall be construed to allow the use of marijuana for non-medical purposes, or allow any activity relating to the cultivation, distribution, or consumption of marijuana that is otherwise illegal under State or federal law. No provision of this Chapter shall be deemed a defense or immunity to any action brought against any person by the Butte County District Attorney, the Attorney General of State of California, or the United States of America.

34A-3 Definitions.

Except where the context otherwise requires, the following definitions shall govern the construction of this Chapter:

(a) "Child Care Center" means any licensed child care center, daycare center, or childcare home, or any preschool.

(b) "Church" means a structure or leased portion of a structure, which is used primarily for religious worship and related religious activities.

(c) "Code Enforcement Officer" means any person employed by the County of Butte and appointed to the position of code enforcement officer, as established by Butte County Ordinance Number 2652.

(d) "Cultivation" means the planting, growing, harvesting, drying, processing, or storage of one or more marijuana plants or any part thereof in any location, indoor or outdoor, including from within a fully enclosed and secure building.

(e) "Enforcing Officer" means the Code Enforcement Officer or the Sheriff, or the authorized deputies or designees of either, each of whom is independently authorized to enforce this Chapter.

(f) "Fence" means a wall or a barrier connected by boards, masonry, rails, panels, wire or any other materials approved by the Department of Development Services for the purpose of enclosing space or separating parcels of land. The term "fence" does not include retaining walls.

(g) "Indoors" means within a fully enclosed and secure structure that complies with the California Building Standards Code (Title 24 California Code of Regulations), as adopted by the County of Butte, that has a complete roof enclosure supported by connecting walls extending from the ground to the roof, and a foundation, slab, or equivalent base to which the floor is securely attached. The structure must be secure against unauthorized entry, accessible only through one or more lockable doors, and constructed of solid materials that cannot easily be broken through, such as 2" x 4" or thicker studs overlain with 3/8" or thicker plywood or equivalent materials. Plastic sheeting, regardless of gauge, or similar products do not satisfy this requirement.

(h) "Legal parcel" means any parcel of real property that may be separately sold in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act (Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410) of Title 7 of the Government Code).

(i) "Marijuana plant" means any mature or immature marijuana plant, or any marijuana seedling, unless otherwise specifically provided herein. A "mature" marijuana plant is one whose sex can be determined by visual inspection.

(j) "Medical marijuana collective" means qualified patients, persons with valid identification cards, and the designated primary caregivers of qualified patients who associate by written agreement, or form a cooperative in accordance with Section 12300 of the Corporations Code within the unincorporated area of the County in order to collectively or cooperatively cultivate marijuana for medical purposes, as provided in Health and Safety Code Section 11362.775. The term collective shall include "cooperative" unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(k) "Outdoors" means any location that is not "indoors" within a fully enclosed and secure structure as defined herein.

(l) "Parcel" means a "legal parcel" as defined herein.

(m) "Premises" means a single, legal parcel of property. Where contiguous legal parcels are under common ownership or control, such contiguous legal parcels shall be counted as a single "premises" for purposes of this Chapter.

(n) "Primary caregiver" means a "primary caregiver" as defined in Health and Safety Code* Section 11362.7(d).

(o) "Qualified patient" means a "qualified patient" as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 11362.7(f).

(p) "Residential treatment facility" means a facility providing for treatment of drug and alcohol dependency, including any "sober living facility" run by treatment providers for the benefit of transitional living.

(q) "School" means an institution of learning for minors, whether public or private, offering a regular course of instruction required by the California Education Code, or any child or day care facility. This definition includes a nursery school, kindergarten, elementary school, middle or junior high school, senior high school, or any special institution of education, but it does not include a vocational or professional institution of higher education, including a community or junior college, college or university.

(r) "School Bus Stop" means any location designated in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 13, section 1238, to receive school buses, as defined in California Vehicle Code section 233, or school pupil activity buses, as defined in Vehicle Code section 546.

(s) "School Evacuation Site" means any location designated by formal action of the governing body, Superintendent, or principal of any school as a location to which juveniles are to be evacuated to, or are to assemble at, in the event of an emergency or other incident at the school.

(t) "Sheriff" or "Sheriff's Office" means the Butte County Sheriff's Office or the authorized representatives thereof.

(u) "Youth-oriented facility" means elementary school, middle school, high school, public park, and any establishment that advertises in a manner that identifies the establishment as catering to or providing services primarily intended for minors, or the individuals who regularly patronize, congregate or assemble at the establishment are predominantly minors. This shall not include a day care or preschool facility.

34A-4 Nuisance Declared; Cultivation Restrictions.

(a) The cultivation of more than the following total number of marijuana plants, either indoors, outdoors, or combined on any premises is hereby declared to be unlawful and a public nuisance that may be abated in accordance with this Chapter:

(1) If the premises is one half (0.5) acre in size or less, no plants may be cultivated on the premises;
(2) If the premises is greater than one half (0.5) acre in size but less than one and a half (1.5) acres in size, no more than six (6) mature marijuana plants or twelve (12) immature plants. If both mature and immature marijuana plants are cultivated on the premises, there shall be no more than six (6) mature marijuana plants and no more than twelve (12) total marijuana plants;
(3) If the premises is greater than one and a half (1.5) acres in size but less than twenty (20) acres in size, no more than twelve (12) mature marijuana plants or twenty-four (24) immature marijuana plants shall be cultivated on the premises. If both mature and immature marijuana plants are cultivated on the premises, there shall be no more than twelve (12) mature marijuana plants and no more than twenty-four (24) total marijuana plants.
(4) If the premises is greater than twenty (20) acres in size but less than eighty (80) acres in size, no more than twenty four (24) mature marijuana plants or forty eight (48) immature marijuana plants shall be cultivated on the premises. If both mature and immature marijuana plants are cultivated on the premises, there shall be no more than twenty four (24) mature marijuana plants and no more than forty eight (48) total marijuana plants.
(5) If the premises is greater than eighty (80) acres in size but less than one hundred and sixty (160) acres in size, no more than thirty six (36) mature marijuana plants or seventy two (72) immature marijuana plants shall be cultivated on the premises. If both mature and immature marijuana plants are cultivated on the premises, there shall be no more than thirty six (36) mature marijuana plants and no more than seventy two (72) total marijuana plants.
(6) If the premises is one hundred and sixty (160) acres or greater in size, no more than ninety-nine (99) marijuana plants, whether mature or immature, shall be cultivated on the premises. The limitations of section 34A-4(a) shall be imposed regardless of the number of qualified patients or primary caregivers residing at the premises or participating directly or indirectly in the cultivation. Further, such limitations shall be imposed notwithstanding any assertion that the persons(s) cultivating marijuana are the primary caregiver(s) for qualified patients or that such persons(s) are collectively or cooperatively cultivating marijuana. And further, all person(s) cultivating marijuana on the premises or participating directly or indirectly in the cultivation must be Butte County residents.

34A-5. Registration; Cultivation Requirements.

The cultivation of marijuana, in any amount or quantity, either indoors or outdoors, upon any premises is hereby declared to be unlawful and a public nuisance that may be abated in accordance with this Chapter, unless all of the following conditions are satisfied:

(a) The persons owning, leasing, occupying, or having charge or possession of any premises greater than one and a half (1.5) acres in size have registered the premises with the Butte County Department of Development Services on an annual basis and provided all of the following current information and documentation to the office:

(1) The name and current address of each person, owning, leasing, occupying, or having charge or possession of the premises;
(2) The name and current address of each qualified patient or primary caregiver who participates in the cultivation, either directly or by providing reimbursement for the necessary expenses for the cultivation of that marijuana;
(3) a copy of the current valid medical recommendation or State-issued medical marijuana card for each qualified patient identified as required above, and for each qualified patient for whom any person identified as required above is the primary caregiver;
(4) the number of marijuana plants cultivated on the premises; and
(5) such other information and documentation as the Department of Development Services determines is necessary to ensure compliance with State law and this Chapter. Such registration with the Department of Development Services shall be renewed by the applicant on an annual basis.

(b) This information and documentation shall be received in confidence, and shall be used or disclosed only for purposes of administration or enforcement of this Chapter or State law, or as otherwise required by law. The Department of Development Services shall become a designated entity pursuant to the requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, otherwise known as HIPAA.

(c) Persons cultivating no more than (1) six (6) mature marijuana plants or (2) twelve (12) immature marijuana plants or (3) twelve (12) total mature and immature marijuana plants (with no more than six (6) mature plants in such combination) are not required to meet the requirements of section 34A-5(a), notwithstanding the size of the premises.

(d) Fees related to the implementation of the "Butte County Medical Marijuana Cultivation Ordinance" shall be as adopted by Resolution of the Board of Supervisors as part of the Butte County Master Fee Schedule.

34A-6. Setbacks.

(a) Each building or outdoor area in which the marijuana is cultivated shall be set back from the boundaries of the premises as follows:

(1) If the premises is one and a half (1.5) acres in size or less, each cultivation building or area shall be set back at least fifteen (15) feet from all boundaries of the premises. Such cultivation area shall be measured from the outer edge of the marijuana plant and not the stalk.
(2) If the premises is greater than one and a half (1.5) acres in size but less than twenty (20) acres in size, each cultivation building or area shall be set back at least one hundred (100) feet from all boundaries of the premises, unless the Director of the Department of Development Services or his or her designee or the Board of Supervisors reduces or waives this requirement based upon an irregular lot shape making it difficult to comply with such setback requirements.
(3) If the premises is greater than twenty (20) acres in size but less than eighty (80) acres in size, each cultivation building or area shall be set back at least two hundred fifty (250) feet from all boundaries of the premises, unless the Director of the Department of Development Services or his or her designee or the Board of Supervisors reduces or waives this requirement based upon an irregular lot shape making it difficult to comply with such setback requirements.
(4) If the premises is greater than eighty (80) acres in size but less than one hundred and sixty (160) acres in size, each cultivation building or area shall be set back at least five hundred (500) feet from all boundaries of the premises, unless the Director of the Department of Development Services or his or her designee or the Board of Supervisors reduces or waives this requirement based upon an irregular lot shape making it difficult to comply with such setback requirements.
(5) If the premises is one hundred and sixty (160) acres or greater in size, each cultivation building or area shall be set back at least seven hundred (700) feet from all boundaries of the premises, unless the Director of the Department of Development Services or his or her designee or the Board of Supervisors reduces or waives this requirement based upon an irregular lot shape making it difficult to comply with such setback requirements.
(6) With respect to subsections 34A-6(a)(2-4), such setback distance shall be measured in a straight line from the building in which the marijuana is cultivated or if the marijuana is cultivated in an outdoor area, from the fence required by section 34A-8, to the boundary line of the premises.

(b) Notwithstanding the requirements of subsection 34A-6(a) above, the cultivation of marijuana, whether grown collectively or individually, in any amount or quantity, shall not be allowed in the following areas:

(1) Within one thousand (1,000) feet of a youth-oriented facility, a school, a park, or any church or residential treatment facility as defined herein.
(2) Outdoors within one hundred (100) feet of any occupied residential structure located on a separate legal parcel, provided, however, that any person cultivating no more than 6 mature or 12 immature marijuana plants (or 12 marijuana plants total with no more than six (6) mature plants in such combination) shall not grow outdoors within thirty (30) feet of any occupied residential structure located on a separate legal parcel.
(3) In any location where the marijuana plants are visible from the public right of way or publicly traveled private roads.

(c) The distance between the above-listed uses in Section (b)(1) and marijuana that is being cultivated shall be measured in a straight line from the nearest point of the fence required in section 34A-8, or if the marijuana is cultivated indoors, from the nearest exterior wall of the building in which the marijuana is cultivated to the nearest boundary line of the property on which the facility, building, or structure, or portion of the facility, building, or structure in which the above-listed use occurs is located. The distance in Section (b)(2) shall be measured from the fence required in Section 34A-8 to the nearest exterior wall of the residential structure.

(d) No person owning, leasing, occupying, or having charge or possession of any premises within the County shall cause, allow, suffer, or permit such premises to be used for the outdoor or indoor cultivation of marijuana plants in violation of this chapter.

34A-7 Permission of Property Owner.

If the person(s) cultivating marijuana on any legal parcel is/are not the legal owner(s) of the parcel, such person(s) shall submit a notarized letter from the legal owner(s) consenting to the cultivation of marijuana on the parcel. This letter shall be examined by the Department of Development Services and shall then be returned to the submitter. The Department of Development Services shall prescribe forms for such letters.

34A-8 Fencing.

All marijuana grown outside of any building must be fully enclosed by a solid and opaque fence (of approved materials by the Department of Development Services) at least six (6) feet in height or a height sufficient to conceal the marijuana from view, whichever is higher, provided, however, that such fence shall not be required for marijuana grown on premises of twenty (20) acres or more when such marijuana is grown out of sight from public view. The Director of the Department of Development Services or his or her designee shall have discretion to determine whether the plants are grown out of sight from public view. Should the marijuana plant(s) grow higher than the fence, either (1) the plants shall be cut so as to not extend higher than such fence or (2) the person growing marijuana plants shall install a fence sufficient to conceal the marijuana plants from public view and comply with all applicable Butte County permit requirements. The fence must be adequately secure to prevent unauthorized entry. Bushes or hedgerows shall not constitute an adequate fence under this Chapter.

34A-9 Notice Regarding Change in Land Use.

The County shall encourage any person proposing to construct or operate a new or relocated school, school bus stop, school evacuation site, church, park, child care center, or youth-oriented facility to consider whether the proposed location of such use is within the required setback near a registered premises upon which marijuana is cultivated. Notwithstanding the requirements of section 34A-5, upon request, the Butte County Department of Development Services shall inform any person proposing to construct or operate a new or relocated school, school bus stop, school evacuation site, church, park, child care center, or youth-oriented facility regarding whether there is a registered premises upon which marijuana is cultivated within the required setback near the proposed location of such use, and, if so, shall also inform the person, owning, leasing, occupying, or having charge or possession of the registered premises that such a use is being proposed within the required setback.

34A-10 Public Nuisance; Violations.

A violation of any provision of this Chapter shall be deemed to be a public nuisance and subject to the enforcement process as set forth in sections 34A-11 through 34A-17 of this Chapter.

34A-11 Enforcement.

(a) The County may, in its discretion, abate the violation of this Chapter by the prosecution of a civil action, including an action for injunctive relief without first going through the administrative procedures set forth herein. The remedy of injunctive relief may take the form of a court order, enforceable through civil contempt proceedings, prohibiting the maintenance of the violation of this Chapter or requiring compliance with other terms.

(b) The County may also abate the violation of this Chapter through the abatement process established by Government Code Section 25845 as set forth in Sections 34A-12 through 34A-17 beginning with the service of a Notice of Nuisance Abatement Hearing.

34A-12 Abatement procedures.

(a) Whenever the Director of Development Services, or his or her designee determines that a public nuisance (as defined in this Chapter) exists, he or she, or his or her designee, shall request in writing that the public nuisance be abated within seventy-two (72) hours. If the condition(s) continue beyond that seventy-two (72) hour period, the Director of Development Services, or his or her designee, may set the matter for hearing. If the matter is set for hearing, the Director of Development Services or his or her designee, shall post the property upon which the public nuisance exists and shall mail, with a proof of service, notices to those persons known to be in possession of the property, if any, and to persons shown on the latest County tax roll to be the owners of the property at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, unless thirty (30) days or other notice is required by Health and Safety Code section 17980 or other state law. Both the mailed and posted notice shall be in substantially the following form:

NOTICE OF NUISANCE ABATEMENT HEARING

The owner(s) and occupant(s) of real property described on the latest equalized Butte County tax roll as A.P. No. _________ and having a street address of ________________is (are) hereby notified to appear before a Hearing Officer of the County of Butte at __________ on _____________ , 20__________ , at the hour of ____________ o'clock _____________ m., to show cause, if any there be, why the use of said real property should not be found to be a public nuisance and abated pursuant to the Butte County Code Chapter 34A. The Department of Development Services has determined that conditions exist on the above property which constitute a public nuisance and violate Butte County Code section(s) ______________ , as follows: ________________. After hearing, if a violation is found to exist, the cost of abating such violation, including, but not limited to, the cost of the Hearing Officer, the cost of prior time and expenses associated with bringing the matter to hearing, attorneys' fees, the cost associated with any appeals from the decision of the Hearing Officer, the cost of judicially abating the violation, the cost of labor and material necessary to physically abate the violation, and the cost of securing expert and other witnesses may become a lien against the subject property and may also be assessed against the property in the same manner as taxes. If an abatement lien is recorded, it will have the same force and effect as an abstract of judgment which is recorded as a money judgment obtained in a court of law. If you fail to appear at the hearing or if you fail to raise any defense or assert any relevant point at the time of hearing, the County will assert, in later judicial proceedings to enforce an order of abatement, that you have waived all rights to assert such defenses or such points.

In preparing for such hearing, you should be aware that if an initial showing is made by the County, sufficient to persuade the Hearing Officer that a public nuisance exists on your property, you will then have the burden of proving that no public nuisance exists on your property. Therefore, you should be prepared to introduce oral and documentary evidence proving why, in your opinion, your use of the property is not a public nuisance as defined in this Chapter. A copy of the Butte County Code Chapter 34A relating to Medical Marijuana Cultivation nuisance abatement hearings is enclosed to assist you in the preparation of your presentation.

If an initial showing sufficient to persuade the Hearing Officer that a public nuisance exists on your property is made by the Code Enforcement Officer, your failure to sustain the burden of showing that no public nuisance exists on the property may result in an administrative decision ordering the abatement of uses or conditions on your property which are found to be a public nuisance and may also result in a later judicial order to the same effect.

Further, if the Hearing Officer finds that a public nuisance exists on your property and you fail to abate the nuisance promptly, the County may abate the nuisance. If the County abates the nuisance, you may be responsible for the actual costs of the abatement, including the costs to the County of the administrative hearing and attorneys' fees, and such costs may be specially assessed against your parcel by the Auditor-Controller's Office and added to the your tax bill as a special assessment. Such special assessments have the same priority, for collection purposes, as other county taxes and, if not paid, may result in a forced sale of your property. You are also hereby notified that the County will seek recovery of attorneys' fees incurred in any abatement hearing and that attorneys' fees may be recovered by the prevailing party. Finally, if the Hearing Officer finds that a public nuisance exists on your property, a violation of the Butte County Code Chapter 34A, the County will contend that you are bound by such finding at any subsequent judicial action to enforce the Hearing Officer's order.

IMPORTANT: READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. FAILURE TO APPEAR AND RESPOND AT THE TIME SET FORTH IN THIS NOTICE WILL LIKELY RESULT IN ADMINISTRATIVE AND/OR JUDICIAL ABATEMENT AND TERMINATION OF USES OF OR CONDITIONS ON YOUR PROPERTY WHICH THE DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CONTENDS ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE BUTTE COUNTY CODE.

Dated: _______________/______________/_____________ BUTTE COUNTY DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES By: __________________

Enclosure: Butte County Code Chapter 34A

(b) All hearings conducted under this Chapter shall be held before a Hearing Officer designated pursuant to the protocol set forth in that document entitled the "Butte County Administrative Hearing Officer Program." The Program is based upon an alphabetical rotation through attorneys currently under contract through the Program.

(c) At the time and place set for the hearing, the Hearing Officer shall review the Director of Development Services' decision ordering cessation of the alleged public nuisance to determine whether such decision conforms to law and is supported by substantial evidence. The Hearing Officer shall hear testimony and receive written and/or documentary evidence relating to the alleged violation. Additional procedural rules may be adopted by resolution of the Board of Supervisors. The Hearing Officer shall tape record the hearing or engage the services of a certified court reporter to record the hearing and shall preserve the record of the hearing and all photographs and demonstrative and documentary evidence introduced at the time of the hearing for a period of three (3) years.

(d) Within ten (10) days after the hearing is closed, the Hearing Officer shall render his or her written decision relating to the existence or nonexistence of the alleged public nuisance. If a violation is found to exist, the decision shall include a statement of the Abatement and Administrative Costs incurred by the County or estimated costs to abate the violation and shall also order that the owner of the property, or persons known to be in possession of the property, abate the violation within a reasonable time, not to exceed ten (10) days. The decision shall contain findings of fact and conclusions of law. A copy of the decision shall be mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the person or persons shown on the last County tax roll to be the owners of the property which is the subject of the hearing and the occupant of such parcel, if any. All other persons noticed pursuant to this section shall be mailed a copy of the decision by first class mail, postage prepaid.

(e) The decision of the Hearing Officer shall be final on the date the certified mail set forth in subsection (d) above, is deposited in the mail. The Hearing Officer shall notify the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of his or her decision, the date upon which the decision became final and the last date upon which an appeal may be made. If the Board of Supervisors does not receive an appeal within ten (10) days of the date the Hearing Officer's decision becomes final, the Board shall be deemed to have ratified and adopted the Hearing Officer's decision. If it is the decision of the Hearing Officer that a public nuisance exists, the owner of the property shall be responsible for paying all of the County's Abatement Costs and Administrative Costs, including but not limited to, those cost items set forth in the notice required by subsection (a) above.

(f) Within the ten (10) day period referred to in subsection (e) above, the owner or occupant of the property, the Director of Development Services, or any other interested person may appeal the decision of the Hearing Officer to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte if such individual or entity does all of the following:

(1) Delivers a written appeal to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors within the ten (10) day appeal period; and
(2) Delivers to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors within the ten (10) day appeal period the appeal fee in the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00).

(g) Within ten (10) days of being notified by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the appellant shall deposit with the Clerk of the Board an amount of money equal to the estimated cost of transcribing the oral proceedings before the Hearing Officer and the cost of duplicating seven (7) copies of the administrative record, including all exhibits introduced at the hearing. The appellant shall be responsible for the cost of the appeal and record; provided, however, if the Board upholds the appeal and finds that no violation exists then the costs of the appeal shall be borne by the County.

(h) In the event of an appeal to the Board of Supervisors, the Board shall decide the appeal based solely on the administrative record and transcript of the hearing. The Board shall review the record, transcript and evidence and then adopt, reject or modify the decision of the Hearing Officer.

(i) In the event of an appeal to the Board of Supervisors, the Board shall decide the appeal within thirty (30) days after receipt of the administrative record. Notice of the Board's decision shall be mailed to the property owner, the Director of Development Services, the Hearing Officer and those persons receiving notice pursuant to this section.

(j) (1) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Code, if a final decision of the Hearing Officer or the Board of Supervisors finds that a violation exists and the public nuisance is not voluntarily abated within the time prescribed, the Director of Development Services or his or her designee may abate the public nuisance pursuant to a warrant issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. The owner of the property shall be responsible for paying all of the County's Abatement Costs and Administrative Costs, including but not limited to, those cost items set forth in the notice required by subsection (a) above. The Director of Development Services or his or her designee shall keep an accounting of the Abatement and Administrative Costs to perform each abatement. Upon completion of the abatement, the Director of Development Services or his or her designee shall post the property and send a bill to the owner, and any persons known to be in possession of the property, requesting payment of the County's Abatement and Administrative Costs. The bill shall also state that failure to pay the Abatement and Administrative Costs within fifteen (15) days from service of the bill may result in the recording of a lien and the placement of a special assessment against the property.

(2) If the County's Abatement and Administrative Costs are not paid within fifteen (15) days from service of the bill, the Director of Development Services shall render an itemized report to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors for submittal to the Board of Supervisors for hearing and consideration regarding the proposed lien and special assessment. The report shall include the names and addresses of the owner of record and any persons known to be in possession of the property. The report shall also include the date the abatement was ordered, the work performed, the date the abatement was completed, a description of the property subject to the lien and special assessment, and an itemized account of the County's Abatement and Administrative Costs. At least fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing, the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors shall give notice, with an affidavit of service, of said hearing to all persons named in the Director of Development Services' report and the Director of Development Services or his or her designee shall post the property with a copy of the notice. The notice shall describe the property by assessor's parcel number and street number or other description sufficient to enable identification of the property and contain a statement of the amount of the proposed lien and special assessment. The notice shall also contain a statement that the Board will hear and consider objections and protests to the proposed lien and special assessment at the designated time and place.

(k) At the time and place fixed in the notice, the Board of Supervisors shall hear and consider the proposed lien and special assessment together with objections and protests thereto. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Board of Supervisors may make such modifications and revisions to the proposed lien and special assessment as it deems just and may order that the proposed lien and special assessment be recorded by the Director of Development Services and specially assessed against the property by the Auditor-Controller's Office. The lien shall have the same force, priority and effect as a judgment lien and the special assessment shall have the same priority as other County taxes.

(1) The notice of abatement lien shall, at a minimum, identify the record owner or possessor of the property, set forth the date upon which abatement of the nuisance was ordered or deemed ordered by the Board of Supervisors, describe the real property subject to the lien, set forth the amount of the Abatement Costs and Administrative Costs incurred to date and, if applicable, the date upon which the abatement was completed. If the abatement has not yet been completed, the notice shall so state and shall also indicate that the lien is a partial lien and that additional Abatement Costs will be incurred in the future. It is the intent of the Board of Supervisors that Abatement Costs and Administrative Costs incurred after the filing of the notice of abatement lien relate back to the date upon which the lien was recorded for purposes of priority; however, in order to preserve its rights, after all Abatement Costs and Administrative Costs have been incurred and the abatement is complete, the Department of Development Services shall cause a supplemental notice of abatement lien to be recorded. The supplemental notice shall contain all of the information required for the original notice and shall also refer to the recordation date and the recorder's document number of the original notice.

(m) The decision of the Hearing Officer or Board of Supervisors may be recorded by the Director of Development Services. In the event of such recordation and in the further event that the violation is corrected, a notice of such correction shall be recorded. The Director of Development Services is authorized to prepare and record a notice of correction. Correction of the violation shall not excuse the property owner's liability for costs incurred during the administrative abatement process (Abatement Costs and Administrative Costs as defined in section 34A-14 of this Chapter). If the property owner has not fully compensated the County for costs incurred during the administrative abatement process, a notice of correction shall not be recorded unless the fee specified in section 41-9 of Chapter 41 has been paid. Payment of the fee specified in section 41-9 of Chapter 41 does not excuse the property owner's liability for costs incurred during the administrative abatement process (Abatement Costs and Administrative Costs as defined in section 34A-14 of this chapter).

34A-13 Alternative hearing procedure.

If all Hearing Officers are unavailable to conduct hearings for any reason, the Board of Supervisors shall conduct nuisance abatement hearings. Should the Board of Supervisors conduct said hearings all notice provisions and hearing procedures set forth herein shall apply. The decision of the Board of Supervisors shall be final.

34A-14 Abatement costs; Administrative costs.

(a) The term "Abatement Costs" means any costs or expenses reasonably related to the abatement of conditions which violate the Butte County Code, and shall include, but not be limited to, enforcement, investigation, attorneys' fees, collection and administrative costs, and the costs associated with the removal or correction of the violation.

(b) The term "Administrative Costs," shall include the cost of County staff time reasonably related to enforcement, for items including, but not limited to, site inspections, travel time, investigations, telephone contacts and time spent preparing summaries, reports, notices, correspondence, warrants and hearing packets. The time expended by Development Services and Auditor-controller staff, to calculate the above costs and prepare itemized invoices, may also be recovered.

(c) In any action, administrative proceeding, or special proceeding to abate a nuisance, attorneys' fees may be recovered by the prevailing party. In no action, administrative proceeding, or special proceeding shall an award of attorneys' fees to a prevailing party exceed the amount of reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by the County in the action or proceeding.

34A-15 Non-exclusive remedy.

This Chapter is cumulative to all other remedies now or hereafter available to abate or otherwise regulate or prevent public nuisances.

34A-16 Administrative Civil Penalties.

In addition to any other remedies provided by County Code or State Law, there is hereby imposed the following civil penalty for each violation of this Chapter, as imposed by the Code Enforcement Officer:

(a) No less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) per day and no more than one hundred dollars ($100.00) per day for the first violation; no less than one hundred dollars ($100.00) per day and no more than two hundred dollars ($200.00) per day for a second violation of this Chapter within one (1) year; and no less than two hundred dollars ($200.00) per day and no more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) per day for each additional violation of this Chapter within one (1) year for each day that the violation exists after the date of mailing of the notice of violation through to its abatement by whatever means.

(b) The Code Enforcement Officer shall have the sole and exclusive discretion to set the amount of civil penalties within the ranges set forth in this Section. The Code Enforcement Officer shall not impose a penalty greater than the minimum amount in range of civil penalties set forth in this Section, unless the Code Enforcement Officer's department has established a written policy setting forth how civil penalties within the ranges are determined. Such policy shall take into account the facts and circumstances of the violation including, but not limited to, whether or not the violation poses a threat to human health, safety or to the environment; the seriousness or gravity of the violation; the length of time the violation has existed; the culpability of the person in violation or the willfulness of the violation; the sophistication of the persons creating or causing the violation; the extent of the violation and its effect on adjoining properties; attempts, if any, to comply with the applicable ordinances; and any other information which might be relevant to the determination of penalty to be imposed by this Section.

(c) If the penalty is imposed for violation of this Chapter there shall be imposed a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00), plus the actual costs of abatement.

(d) At the discretion of the Code Enforcement Officer, or his or her designee, or upon the appeal of the property owner, the determination may be referred to a Hearing Officer of the County, duly appointed to hear such matters as described in this Chapter. The determination of the Hearing Officer as to the amount of charges properly imposed under this Section shall be final, subject only to judicial review.

(e) The charges imposed by this Section shall not apply if the property owner establishes all of the following: (i) that, at the time he or she acquired the property, a violation of this code already existed on the property; (ii) the property owner did not have actual or constructive notice of the existence of that violation; and (iii) within thirty (30) days after the mailing of notice of the existence of that violation, the property owner initiates and pursues, with due diligence, good faith efforts, as determined solely by the Code Enforcement Officer, to meet the requirements of this code.

(f) In the event a property owner, in the opinion of the relevant Department Head(s), abates the nuisance in a timely manner after the Notice and Order to Abate has been issued, the relevant Department Head(s) has (have) the authority to waive or reduce the amount of penalties owed, if in his or her opinion such a reduction is warranted.

34A-17 Summary Abatement.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter, when any unlawful marijuana cultivation constitutes an immediate threat to the public health or safety, and where the procedures set forth in sections 34A-11 through 34A-15 would not result in abatement of that nuisance within a short enough time period to avoid that threat, the enforcing officer may direct any officer or employee of the County to summarily abate the nuisance. The enforcing officer shall make reasonable efforts to notify the persons identified in Section 34A-12 but the formal notice and

hearing procedures set forth in this Chapter shall not apply. No summary abatement shall occur prior to consultation with the Office of County Counsel. The County may nevertheless recover its costs for abating that nuisance in the manner set forth in Sections 34A-12.

34A-18 No Duty to Enforce.

Nothing in this Chapter shall be construed as imposing on the enforcing officer or the County of Butte any duty to issue a Notice to Abate Unlawful Marijuana Cultivation, nor to abate any unlawful marijuana cultivation, nor to take any other action with regard to any unlawful marijuana cultivation, and neither the enforcing officer nor the County shall be held liable for failure to issue an order to abate any unlawful marijuana cultivation, nor for failure to abate any unlawful marijuana cultivation, nor for failure to take any other action with regard to any unlawful marijuana cultivation.

34A-19 Use of Money Collected Under This Chapter.

All money collected for penalties for violations of this Chapter and all money collected for recovery of costs of enforcement of this Chapter shall be made available to the Department responsible for the enforcement action for training and further code enforcement actions.

Section 2. The County finds that this Chapter is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15061(b)(3) (there is no possibility the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment). In addition to the foregoing general exemptions, the following categorical exemptions apply: Sections 15308 (actions taken as authorized by local ordinance to assure protection of the environment) and 15321 (action by agency for enforcement of a law, general rule, standard or objective administered or adopted by the agency, including by direct referral to the County Counsel as appropriate for judicial enforcement).

Section 3. If any provision of this Chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of this Chapter, including the application of such party or provision to other circumstances shall not be affected thereby and shall continue in full force and effect. To this end, provisions of this Chapter are severable. The Board of Supervisors hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase hereof irrespective of the fact that any one (1) or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be held unconstitutional, invalid or unenforceable.

Section 4. The Clerk of the Board will publish the Ordinance codified in this Chapter as required by law. The Ordinance codified in this Chapter shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage."

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, on the 24th day of May, 2011, by the following vote:

AYES:SUPERVISORS CONNELLY, KIRK, YAMAGUCHI, AND CHAIR LAMBERT NOES:SUPERVISOR WAHL ABSENT:NONE NOT VOTING:NONE

s/ STEVE LAMBERT, Chair of the Butte County Board of Supervisors

ATTEST: By:
s/ Paul Hahn, Deputy Chief Administrative Officer and Clerk of the Board


Butte Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: September 26, 2012 08:46 PDT
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://cavotes.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.