This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/oh/state/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of Ohio Education Fund
Hamilton County, OH November 2, 2010 Election
Smart Voter

Sylvia Sieve Hendon
Answers Questions

Candidate for
Judge; Ohio State Court of Appeals; District 1; 6 Year Term

[photo]
 
[line]

The questions were prepared by the League of Women Voters of Ohio and asked of all candidates for this office.
Read the answers from all candidates (who have responded).

Questions & Answers

1. What are your Qualifications for Office? (50 word limit)

I have served on all levels of the court system in Hamilton County and bring nearly 27 years of judicial experience to the Appellate bench. Judicial restraint and thoughtful adherence to precedent are hallmarks of my decisions.

2. What plans do you have to address your top three priorities? (100 word limit)

Timeliness of opinions is a top priority for me. I have strictly followed the Supreme Court guidelines for the release of cases and will continue to do so in order to effectively keep the docket current. Thoughtful research and clarity of the written decision are crucial in an appellate release because this Court's findings bind the lower courts in this jurisdiction.

3. How do you define "judicial independence," and how important is it to our judicial system? What measures ensure an independent judiciary? (150 word limit)

Judicial independence is critical to the public's perception of justice. It is important that no matter what the result, the litigants know that their case has been fully and carefully heard. A judge must avoid even the appearance of impropriety and recuse him/herself when conflicts arise.

4. Would you recuse yourself if a party before you had made a significant judicial campaign expenditure toward your election? Please explain. (150 words)

It is axiomatic that a recusal would be appropriate if a significant campaign contribution is received. The question introduces the broader issue of campaign financing in general in judicial races. The Supreme Court has set limits on contributions that vary with the office sought, but the possibility for campaign influence still exists. I would welcome revisions of the current rules, as well as a retention form of election for the higher courts of Ohio.

5. What do you perceive to be the greatest obstacle to justice in Ohio? (150 words)

The only obstacle to "justice" in Ohio might be the heavy caseloads carried by most courts. A luxury in the Appellate court is time - something not shared by the trial court bench. The judiciary in Hamilton County is known statewide for its innovative procedures and for its reputation for integrity. Access to court is guaranteed for all citizens in the First District Court of Appeals, and pro se litigants are treated with the same respect and adherence to the Rules of Procedure that govern the practicing bar.


Responses to questions asked of each candidate are reproduced as submitted to the League.  Candidates' statements are presented as submitted. Word limits apply for each question. Direct references to opponents are not permitted.

Read the answers from all candidates (who have responded).

Candidate Page || Feedback to Candidate || This Contest
SmartVoter Home (Ballot Lookup) || About Smart Voter


Created from information supplied by the candidate: October 19, 2010 10:11
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://www.lwvc.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.