This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sd/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund If you appreciate our service to voters, please consider helping us with a donation.
Smart Voter
San Diego County, CA November 2, 2010 Election
Proposition K
School Bonds
San Marcos Unified School District

55% Approval Required

Pass: 20,082 / 63.4% Yes votes ...... 11,600 / 36.6% No votes

See Also: Index of all Propositions

Information shown below: Summary | Yes/No Meaning | Impartial Analysis | Arguments | Tax Rate Statement |

To maintain excellent local schools, repair aging, deteriorating classrooms/schools, attract quality teachers and offset State cuts by: removing asbestos, lead paint, repairing roofs, plumbing, wiring; preventing overcrowding; upgrading instructional technology, libraries, science labs; improving seismic, fire and student safety; and improving disabled access; shall San Marcos Unified School District issue $287 million in bonds, at legal interest rates, with citizens' oversight, mandatory audits, no money for District salaries, and all funds remaining local?

Summary:

EDUCATION CODE SECTION 15272

If this Bond measure is approved, the San Marcos Unified School District Governing Board will appoint a citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual independent audits to assure that bond funds are spent only on school and classroom improvements and for no other purposes.

Meaning of Voting Yes/No
A YES vote on this measure means:
A "YES" vote is a vote in favor of authorizing the District to issue and sell $287,000,000 in general obligation bonds.

A NO vote on this measure means:
A "NO" vote is a vote against authorizing the District to issue and sell $287,000,000 in general obligation bonds.

Impartial Analysis from County Counsel
This proposition, if approved by 55% of the voters voting on the proposition, will authorize the San Marcos Unified School District ("District") to issue and sell $287,000,000 in general obligation bonds. The sale of these bonds by the District is for the purpose of raising money for the District, and represents a debt of the District. In exchange for the money received from the holders, the District promises to pay the holder of the bonds an amount of interest for a certain period of time, and to repay the bonds on the maturity date.

Voter approval of this proposition also will authorize an annual tax to be levied upon the taxable property within the District. The purpose of this tax is to generate revenue to pay the principal and interest on the bonds, and such tax revenue will be an amount sufficient to pay the interest as it becomes due and to provide a fund for payment of the principal on or before maturity.

Proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized by this proposition may be used by the District for the construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation or replacement of school facilities, including the furnishing and equipping of school facilities, or the acquisition or lease of real property for school facilities.

The interest rate on any bond, which is established at the time of bond issuance, cannot exceed 12% per annum. The final maturity date of any bond could be no later than 25 years or 40 years after the date the bonds are issued as determined by the District.

The tax authorized by this proposition is consistent with the requirements of the California Constitution. The California Constitution permits property taxes, above the standard one percent (1%) limitation, to be levied upon real property to pay the interest and redemption charges on any bonded indebtedness for the acquisition or improvement of real property, including the furnishing and equipping of school facilities, when approved by 55% of the voters if:

(1) the proceeds from the sale of the bonds are used only for the purposes
specified,
(2) the District, by evaluating safety, class size reduction, and information
technology, has approved a list of specific projects to be funded,
(3) the District will conduct an annual, independent performance audit, and
(4) the District will conduct an annual, independent financial audit.

If a bond proposition is approved, state law requires the District to establish an independent citizens' oversight committee. The District has made this ballot proposition subject to these requirements.

Approval of this proposition does not guarantee that the proposed projects in the District that are the subject of these bonds will be funded beyond the local revenues generated by this proposition.

  News and Analysis

San Diego U-T

This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Proposition K Arguments Against Proposition K
Join the San Diego County Taxpayers Association, civic leaders, parents, and thousands of concerned residents in support of Proposition K, to repair aging classrooms and labs and upgrade educational technology.

Our local schools need Proposition K!

Modern Classrooms: Half of our students are in old, deteriorating or temporary classrooms that pose a risk to student health and safety.

Prevent Overcrowding: District-wide student enrollment has grown consistently since 1995 and will continue to grow over the next decade. Classroom overcrowding is an ever-growing problem.

Essential Technology: Over half our classrooms are too outdated to accommodate modern technology standards.

Proposition K will repair and upgrade local schools, some over 40 years old, to meet 21st-Century educational and safety standards, while taking advantage of current, and historically low construction rates. High quality local schools improve local property values.

Proposition K will help offset State budget cuts and ensure that local students learn in competitive classrooms by:

  • Repairing or replacing aging roofs, windows, and plumbing
  • Removing asbestos and lead paint
  • Improving earthquake preparedness, fire safety and school security
  • Upgrading classroom technology, science labs and libraries
  • Renovating career technical and job training classrooms
  • Updating instructional technology
  • Replacing old, hazardous electrical wiring
  • Rebuilding schools that are too old to maintain cost effectively
  • Preparing for future growth and preventing student overcrowding
  • Leveraging millions of dollars in state matching funds

Proposition K has met stringent San Diego County Taxpayers Association standards and contains tough safeguards to ensure funds are spent as promised:
  • All funds must stay local
  • An independent citizens' oversight committee will oversee use of bond funds
  • No money will go for district administration or instructional salaries

Vote YES on K for our Kids!

MICHAEL H. McDOWELL
Chairman
San Diego County Taxpayers Association
JIM DESMOND
Mayor
City of San Marcos
JAMES COLSTON
Chairman
San Marcos Professional Firefighters Association
Political Action Committee
JAN JACKSON
Chair of Board
San Marcos Chamber of Commerce
JANET McCLEAN
C.P.A./Rancho Carrillo Resident
Carrillo Elementary, 2008-2010
President, Parent Teacher Organization (PTO)

Rebuttal to Arguments For

No rebuttal to the argument in favor of the proposition was filed
in the office of the Registrar of Voters.
A bond is a tax. This tax will cost the residents of San Marcos $287 million plus an estimated $951 million in interest payments on the bond. That is a total of over $1.2 billion in taxes to the homeowners of San Marcos.

The estimated interest to be paid over the next 40 years came from the District's official sources and documented in the "SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Preliminary General Obligation Bond Modeling & Tax Rate Analysis For Bond Authorization Estimates" dated June 21, 2010.

The District states that "all funds will remain local". The estimated $951 million dollars in interest will not remain local. The interest payments will leave San Marcos and will never be available for any repairs, upgrades or technology improvements to our schools.

The District's 2010-2011 adopted budget has revenues of over $123 million. The District has options. The District can delay improvements and set aside money to pay for these improvements on a "pay as you go" basis. The District can also scale back its wish list of improvements. Do the San Elijo schools and Mission Hills High School, that were just recently built, really have upgrade needs that justifies this huge tax increase?

I ask each resident of San Marcos to consider if being taxed an estimated $1.2 billion is fiscally responsible when we can only keep less than 25 percent (or $287 million) of that money locally.

DANIEL FITZGERALD

Rebuttal to Arguments Against
Desirable local schools create safe communities, educated workforces, and strong property values. We can be proud that our local school district has become one of the best in San Diego County, but we can't wait to make urgent repairs and upgrades to our aging campuses and classrooms.

Why now?

  • Old, deteriorating classrooms, some over 40 years old, currently pose a risk to student health and safety.

  • Student enrollment is growing - if we don't act now, both local high schools will be overcrowded when today's 5th graders reach high school.

  • Record low interest rates and construction costs can save millions of dollars, and create hundreds of local jobs.

  • Most classrooms do not support modern technology - Prop K will help ensure that every student is ready for college or career.

  • The district will qualify for over $50 million in state matching funds.

Prop K makes financial sense which is why the San Diego County Taxpayers Association endorsed it after rigorous review.

  • All funds must stay local

  • Independent citizens' committee will oversee all bond funds.

  • No money for salaries or pensions.

Local leaders and public officials agree that now is the best time to repair and modernize our schools, to ensure our local children have the learning tools to continue achieving at the highest levels. Prop K is prudent, responsible and a good investment.

Visit YesonKforKids.org to learn more.

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR KIDS AND VOTE YES ON PROP K.

LANI LUTAR, President and CEO
San Diego County Taxpayers Association
F. H. "CORKY" SMITH
Former Mayor of San Marcos
ROBERT P. DEEGAN
Superintendent/President, Palomar College
RENÉ A. FLORES
President, San Marcos Youth Baseball
LORI FALK
President, Mission Hills High School
Parent Association, 2007-Current

Tax Rate Statement
As shown on the enclosed official ballot, an election is being held in the San Marcos Unified School District ("District") on November 2, 2010, for the purpose of submitting to the registered voters within the District the question of whether the District shall issue and sell bonds in an amount not to exceed $287,000,000 for the purpose of providing funds for the specified school facilities and school projects as set forth in the resolution of the District calling such bond election. This proposition will authorize a tax sufficient for interest on, and redemption of, the bonds. The bonds shall bear interest at a rate, or rates to be established at such time as the bonds are sold, in one or more series, at fixed or variable interest rates not to exceed the maximum applicable statutory rate for such bonds. If such bonds are authorized and sold, the principal thereof and the interest thereon are a general obligation of the District, payable from the proceeds of ad valorem taxes on taxable real property located within the District. The following information is submitted in compliance with California Elections Code Sections 9401 through 9404 based on estimates of assessed valuations available at the time of filing of this statement:

(a) The best estimate from official sources of the tax rate that would be required to be levied to fund the bond issue during the first fiscal year after the first sale of the bonds based on estimated assessed valuations available at the time of filing of this statement or a projection based on experience within the same jurisdiction or other demonstrable factors is $0.04028 per $100 ($40.28 per $100,000) of assessed valuation.

(b) It is anticipated that the bonds will be sold in more than one series. The best estimate from official sources of the tax rate which would be required to be levied to fund such bond issues during the first fiscal year after the last sale of the bonds based on estimated assessed valuations available at the time of filing of this statement or a projection based on experience within the same jurisdiction or other demonstrable factors is $0.04399 per $100 ($43.99 per $100,000) of assessed valuation.

(c) The best estimate from official sources of the highest tax rate which would be required to be levied to fund the bond issues during the term of the bond issues, based on estimated assessed valuations available at the time of filing of this statement or a projection based on experience within the same jurisdiction or other demonstrable factors, is $0.04400 per $100 ($44.00 per $100,000) of assessed valuation. It is estimated that the highest tax rate would apply in the 2019-2020 tax year based on assessed valuations available at the time of this filing or a projection based on experience within the same jurisdiction or other demonstrable factors.

Voters should note that these estimated tax rates are based on the assessed value of taxable property within the District as shown on the official rolls of San Diego County, not on the property's market value. In addition, taxpayers eligible for a property tax exemption, such as the homeowner's exemption, will be taxed at a lower effective rate than described above. Certain taxpayers may also be eligible to postpone the payment of taxes. Property owners should consult their own property tax bills and/or tax advisors to determine their property's assessed value and any applicable tax exemptions.

Attention of all voters is directed to the fact that these estimates are based on assumptions and projections derived from information obtained from official sources. The actual tax rates and the years in which they will apply may vary depending on the timing of any bond sales, the amount of bonds sold, market interest rates at the time of each sale of bonds and actual assessed valuations over the term of repayment of the bonds. The timing of the bond sales and the amount of bonds sold at any given time will be governed by the needs of the District, including the legal limitations on bonds approved by a 55% vote. The actual interest rates at which the bonds will be sold will depend on the bond market at the time of each such sale. Actual future assessed valuation will depend upon the amount and value of taxable property within the District as determined by the San Diego County Assessor in the annual assessment and the equalization process.

Dated: July 12, 2010

Gary Hamels, Assistant Superintendent, Business Services
San Marcos Unified School District


San Diego Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: January 6, 2011 15:00 PST
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://cavotes.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.