Public Confidence in School Board members

By Karen Woodring-Eminson

Some school boards seem to be in constant conflict amongst themselves or with community individuals and organized groups. This is usually caused by school directors who meddle in administrative affairs and don't communicate well with the public and other board members.

Single-issue board members. Some residents appear to join the Board because they have a 'score to settle'. Actions of single-issue members have narrow focus and are counterproductive.

Micromanaging. Board members who act as quasi-administrators in day-to-day district business are not grasping their role in governance, which is to set clear and fair policies to be implemented by the Administration.

Special interest interference. Some school directors are elected because of the support of interest groups representing unions, religious groups, businesses or community organizations. The nature of the relationship between school directors and the interest group that supported them can cause serious conflict when school directors are called upon to vote in the best interest of the District, first and foremost.

Lack of diversity. Recognizing the needs of students from differing socioeconomic levels is critical. Too many school directors with similar backgrounds will limit the board's awareness and resources for providing an all-inclusive education.

Unfortunately, ward and local politics often seem to influence all of the above. Nonetheless, the school director and board's ability to restore and/or maintain the public's confidence remains essential to effective school governance.