This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/la/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund If you appreciate our service to voters, please consider helping us with a donation.
Smart Voter
Los Angeles County, CA May 5, 2009 Election
Measure E
Preserve San Marino Schools
San Marino Unified School District

Special Parcel Tax - 2/3 Approval Required
Final Official Election Returns

Pass: 3,476 / 71.2% Yes votes ...... 1,407 / 28.8% No votes

See Also: Index of all Measures

Information shown below: Official Information | Impartial Analysis | Arguments | Full Text

To mitigate the cuts in the San Marino Unified School District’s educational program that will result from a potential $5 million budget shortfall caused by state budget cuts, to preserve teachers, core academic curriculum, advanced placement and honors classes, arts and athletic programs, and minimize increases in class sizes, shall the San Marino Unified School District authorize a $795 annual education parcel tax, as adjusted, for six (6) years, that will exempt seniors?

Sample ballot in Chinese

Sample ballot in Spanish

Official Sources of Information

Impartial Analysis from Raymond G. Fortner, Jr.
County Counsel
Approval of Measure E would authorize the Board of Education (“Board”) of the San Marino Unified School District (“District”) to levy a special parcel tax (“Tax”) of $795 per year on each parcel of taxable real property that receives a separate property tax bill located within the District. The Tax would be levied for six (6) years, commencing with the 2009-2010 fiscal year of the District and would be adjusted annually by the lesser of the Los Angeles Statistical Area Consumer Price Index or three percent.

The Tax revenues, as determined by the Board, shall only be applied for the purposes of funding core academic programs including English, math, social studies, history and sciences, preserving teaching positions, minimizing increases in class sizes, preserving visual and performing arts and foreign language instruction, physical education and athletic programs, and maintaining advanced placement and honor classes, classroom computer systems and technology, and academic and college counseling positions.

An exemption from the Tax may be obtained by any owner of a parcel used solely for owner-occupied single-family residential purposes and who is age 65 or older upon annual application to the District. Any parcels which are contiguous, used solely for owner-occupied, single-family residential purposes, and held under identical ownership may, by submitting an annual application, be treated as a single parcel for purposes of the Tax. Submission of any application for exemption or contiguous parcel treatment must be in accordance with the rules and regulations adopted by the Board. The decisions of the District relating to the specific levy of the Tax, including the senior citizen exemption and the classification of property for purposes of calculation of the tax, shall be final and binding.

The proceeds of the Tax shall only be applied to the specific purposes identified and shall be deposited into a special account. An annual written report shall be made to the Board showing the amount of funds collected and expended from the proceeds of the Tax, and the status of any projects required or authorized to be funded from the Tax. The collection of the Tax is not intended to decrease or offset any local, state, or federal revenues otherwise available to the District at any time during which the Tax may be levied. In the event that the Tax has such effect, the District shall reduce the Tax to an amount necessary to restore the decrease or offset of revenues.

The Taxes levied under this Measure shall be collected by the Treasurer and Tax Collector at the same time and manner, and subject to the same penalties, as general ad valorem property taxes, and shall become a lien upon the properties against which the Taxes are assessed and collectible. Unpaid Taxes shall bear interest at the same rate as the rate for unpaid ad valorem property taxes.

This Measure requires a two-thirds (2/3) vote for passage

  Official Information

San Marino Unified School District
District Statistics

GreatSchools.net
Organizations in Favor

Citizens for San Marino Schools

San Marino California Real Estate Market Resource
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Measure E Arguments Against Measure E
Drastic state budget cuts will have a severe impact on San Marino schools, the #1 unified school district in California. A $5 million budget shortfall for San Marino schools will jeopardize the legacy of excellence built over 50 years if Measure E is not approved.

Measure E provides a reliable source of local funding to protect our schools from unpredictable state budget cuts.

The facts are clear.

San Marino student test scores are consistently in the top 10%; and 99% of our graduates go to college. Property values are directly related to the quality of our schools.

Without local Measure E funding, San Marino schools will be forced to:
REDUCE core academic classes in English, math, social studies, history, and science;
ELIMINATE 50 to 60 teaching positions (1 out of every 3 teachers);
INCREASE class sizes by 40% to 50%;
REDUCE/ELIMINATE advanced placement and honors classes;
REDUCE/ELIMINATE visual and performing arts classes and programs, including choral music, orchestra, band, speech and debate, drama, and art;
REDUCE/ELIMINATE academic and counseling services;
REDUCE/ELIMINATE foreign language offerings;
REDUCE/ELIMINATE physical education and athletic programs; and,
REDUCE/ELIMINATE classroom technology support.

Measure E requires strict accountability. It offers an exemption to those 65 and older. The entire cost is tax deductible.

All funds will remain in San Marino to benefit our schools. The state cannot take them away.

We must act to avoid these cuts in our outstanding academic, arts and athletic programs. Your YES vote ensures the children of San Marino will continue to receive an exceptional public education, and in so doing we will protect the value of our homes.

Protect the investment our schools make in our community and our future.

PLEASE VOTE YES ON MEASURE E.

ANDREW F. BARTH
Member, Board of Education 1997–2005
Board President 1999–2001, 2004–2005

JEANIE CALDWELL
Member, Board of Education 2001–Current
Board President 2003–2004 2008–Current

NAM JACK
Huntington PTA President, 2008–2009
Valentine PTA President, 2004–2006
San Marino Schools Foundation Trustee 2005–Current

MATTHEW LIN M.D.
Member, San Marino City Council 2001–2009
Mayor 2003–2004, 2006–2008

ROSEMARY SIMMONS
Member, San Marino City Council 1982–1992
Mayor 1986–1988<

Rebuttal to Arguments For
These same proponents gave you nearly $109,000,000 in debt service for one of the most poorly managed, wasteful school construction projects in recent history.

Their financial advisor cleverly rear end loaded the repayment schedule; $3,572,000 in 2010, rising yearly to $6,000,000 in 2025. Spread this over 4450 homes and calculate your cost share. Is this an example of their claimed “accountability”?

San Marino Unified School District spends thousands of dollars annually for consultants. Does none of their highly paid and educated staff have broad knowledge, or common sense to alleviate?

Do not fear cuts in core academic classes. This is SMUSD’s only reason for existence, and a crude scare tactic. San Marino’s school population has scarcely varied in the past 10 years at 3100–3200 students. 119 are non–resident children of City and Schools employees. 10% are special education students.

Maintain 2006 spending levels of $25,000,000. Your property values are not dependent on spending $5,000,000 more annually. It has been affirmed by countless national studies that high per pupil spending does not provide quality education or successful careers. Proposition 98 already guarantees 40% of the State general fund for schools.

No matter when you purchased your home, Proposition 13 is your only defense against confiscatory property taxes. Do not destroy your protection with more parcel taxes.

We should all stand behind good schools, but not frivolous or superfluous spending. Our electorate cannot have escaped recent financial turmoil. You know that retrenchment is necessary. Vote No!!!

GENE G. RUCKH
San Marino Resident and Taxpayer

There is no “bail out”. This is a tax upon a tax. You paid your tax. The County sequestered your money. The SMUSD is back for a second bite. Do not be deceived, this is a direct assault on your property to assure high salaries and benefits, forged by their Union, for teachers and administrators.

SM schools performance is not a result of superior teachers or facilities. It is a result of a small population of achieving families, who demand excellence of their children, and supplement as needed to insure success. As parents, many of us received an excellent K-12 education in an austere classroom with never less than 42 students. Money does not create top students as is evidenced by LA and Washington DC which spend thousands more per student with meager results.

SM’s curriculum is not outstanding. All life skill programs were abandoned long ago in favor of art and cultural abstractions.

SMUSD must cut costs by eliminating non-essentials, reduce employee, teacher, and administrative overhead, freeze salaries and benefits, increase class size, outsource everything possible, freeze all capital programs and expenditures.

Parcel taxes, assessments, and fees are a direct assault on Prop 13. This is $795 annually, increased by 3%/yr for six years on every parcel. We seniors are privileged to file annually for exemption not provided by State law. Beware of 6 years of exemption extended to you by the SMUSD. There is already a $300/yr perpetual parcel tax in effect. Six years is a long time.

Electorate, it borders on naivete for you to think the SMUSD will abate, or give back any of their lucre if the economy improves. They will keep the money, and be back for more. VOTE NO!!!

GENE G. RUCKH
SM Resident and Taxpayer

Rebuttal to Arguments Against
Don’t be confused.

The future of San Marino Schools and our community will be determined by how we vote on Measure E.

The meaning of every vote is very clear:

Every YES vote is a vote to continue the legacy of educational excellence San Marino has built over the last 50 years, a legacy that prepares our children and grandchildren to be great contributors to our society.

Every no vote is a vote to eliminate core teaching positions, significantly increase class sizes, and reduce/eliminate academic, art and athletic programs. It sends a clear message to the children of our community that we no longer value outstanding education, an education so important in supporting their dreams for the future.

Everyone benefits because San Marino’s excellent schools have built, maintained and strengthened local property values.

It is that simple.

Measure E will:

Retain teachers and core instruction in academic, arts, physical education and athletic programs;

Preserve visual and performing arts programs and classes;

Maintain lower class sizes;

Keep honors, advanced placement, academic and counseling programs.

Protect San Marino Schools - ranked #1 in test scores and student performance for five years in a row. All Measure E funds will be spent locally. None can be taken by Sacramento. A senior exemption is available.

Vote YES to protect your property values.

Vote YES to protect our investment in our students and community.

Together, our YES votes will secure the future of our schools. Join us in voting YES on MEASURE E.

GENE DRYDEN
President, San Marino Historical Society 2004–2008
Member, San Marino City Council 1988–2001
Mayor, City of San Marino 1992–1994
Vice Mayor, City of San Marino 1990–1992

MARY FALKENBURY
PTA Council President 2008–09
Huntington Middle School PTA President 2006–07
Carver Elementary School PTA President 2003–04

TIM SLOAN
Financial Advisory Task Force 2008–2009; San Marino High School
Football Boosters 2006 & 2008
Athletic Advisory Task Force 2005–2006; San Marino Schools Foundation Associate Trustee 2003–Present
San Marino Schools Foundation Vice President, Special Projects 2002–2003
San Marino Little League President 2001; San Marino Schools Foundation Trustee 2000–2003

LINDA SUN
San Marino PTA Council, Auditor 2009–10 & 2008–09
PTA President of Chinese School of San Marino 2008–09

JERRY WANG
San Marino Schools Foundation Trustee – 2008–09
Chinese Club of San Marino – Director – 2004–07
Chinese School of San Marino–Board Member 2004–07

Full Text of Measure E
PRESERVE SAN MARINO SCHOOLS

To mitigate the negative effects of California state funding reductions, preserve the excellence of the schools and community, teachers, core academic curriculum, advanced placement and honors classes, arts and athletic programs, and minimize increases in class sizes, the San Marino Unified School District proposes to levy an education parcel tax beginning July 1, 2009, at the rate of $795 per year, as adjusted, on each parcel located within the San Marino Unified School District, with an exemption available for senior citizens, to:

1. Replace revenue lost to our schools by substantial cuts in state funding;

2. Preserve core academic curriculum, including English, math, social studies, history, and science;

3. Preserve teaching positions;

4. Minimize increases in class sizes;

5. Preserve visual and performing arts instruction, foreign language offerings, physical education and athletic programs;

6. Maintain advanced placement and honors courses;

7. Maintain classroom computer systems and technology; and,

8. Maintain academic and college counseling positions

AMOUNT OF EDUCATION PARCEL TAX; PERIOD OF ASSESSMENT
The education parcel tax shall be assessed annually against each Parcel in the amount of $795, adjusted annually by the lesser of the Los Angeles Statistical Area Consumer Price Index or three percent for a total of six (6) full years.

DEFINITION OF “PARCEL”
For purposes of this special tax, the term “Parcel” means any parcel of land which lies wholly or partially within the boundaries of the San Marino Unified School District, that receives a separate tax bill for ad valorem property taxes from the Los Angeles County Assessor/Tax Collector. All property that is otherwise exempt from or upon which are levied no ad valorem property taxes in any year shall also be exempt from the education parcel tax in such year.

EXEMPTION FOR CONTIGUOUS PARCELS
For purposes of this special tax, any such Parcels which are (i) contiguous, (ii) used solely for owner-occupied, single-family residential purposes, and (iii) held under identical ownership may, by submitting an application of the owners thereof each year to the San Marino Unified School District in accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the Board of Education (“Board”), be treated as a single Parcel for purposes of the levy of the education parcel tax.

EXEMPTION FOR SENIORS
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 50079(b), any owner of a Parcel used solely for owner-occupied, single-family residential purposes and who is 65 years of age or older may obtain an exemption from the education parcel tax by annually submitting an application to the San Marino Unified School District in accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the Board.

With respect to all general property tax matters within its jurisdiction, the Los Angeles County Assessor/Tax Collector, or other appropriate County tax officials shall make all final determinations of tax exemption or relief for any reason, and that decision shall be final and binding. With respect to matters specific to the levy of the education parcel tax, including the senior citizen exemption and the classification of property for purposes of calculating the tax, the decisions of the San Marino Unified School District shall be final and binding.

REDUCTION IN TAX IF RESULT IS LESS OTHER GOVERNMENT SUPPORT
The collection of the education parcel tax is not intended to decrease or offset any local, state or federal government revenues that would otherwise be available to the San Marino Unified School District at any time during which the education parcel tax may be levied. In the event that the levy and collection would have such an effect, the San Marino Unified School District shall reduce the education parcel tax to the extent that such action is necessary to restore the amount of the decrease or offset in other revenues that would otherwise occur.

ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES
In accordance with the requirements of Government Code Sections 50075.1 and
50075.3, the following accountability measures, among others, shall apply to the education parcel tax levied in accordance with this measure: (a) the specific purposes of the education parcel tax shall be those purposes identified above; (b) the proceeds of the education parcel tax shall be applied only to those specific purposes identified above; (c) a separate, special account shall be created into which the proceeds of the education parcel tax must be deposited; and (d) an annual written report shall be made to the Board showing (i) the amount of funds collected and expended from the proceeds of the education parcel tax and (ii) the status of any projects or programs required or authorized to be funded from the proceeds of the education parcel tax, as identified above/


Los Angeles Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: September 2, 2009 07:11 PDT
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://www.lwvc.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.