This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sf/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
Smart Voter
San Francisco County, CA November 4, 2008 Election
Proposition I
Creating the Office of an Independent Rate Payer Advocate
City of San Francisco

Charter Amendment - Majority Approval Required

Fail: 117,050 / 36.71% Yes votes ...... 201,811 / 63.29% No votes

See Also: Index of all Propositions

Results as of Jan 24 10:41am, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (580/580)
Information shown below: Fiscal Impact | Yes/No Meaning | Arguments |

Shall the City create an Office of the Independent Ratepayer Advocate to make recommendations about utility rates to the City's Public Utilities Commission?

Fiscal Impact from City Controller:
Should the proposed charter amendment be approved by the voters, in my opinion, it would increase the cost of government by an estimated $250,000 every other year, or $125,000 on an annual basis, for independent analytical services from a ratepayer advocate and for Public Utilities Commission (PUC) staff to respond to requests from the ratepayer advocate. The amendment specifies that this cost would be included as an expense of the utilities and paid for through the charges to their customers.

The proposed amendment adds a ratepayer advocate to the existing Charter-required processes through which the PUC establishes water and wastewater service rates. Currently, these processes include carrying out independent rate and cost studies every five years, performing studies of rate-based incentives for conservation and other programmatic goals, and administering a Rate Fairness Board which reviews and holds hearings on rate proposals prior to their approval by the PUC and Board of Supervisors.

Meaning of Voting Yes/No
A YES vote on this measure means:
If you vote "yes," you want to change the Charter to create an Office of the Independent Ratepayer Advocate to make recommendations about utility rates to the City's PUC.

A NO vote on this measure means:
If you vote "no," you do not want to make this change to the Charter.

  Nonpartisan Information

League of Women Voters

Events

Radio Programs

This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Proposition I
Proposition I would create an Office of the Independent Ratepayer Advocate for the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC). The Independent Ratepayer Advocate would be an independent body from the SFPUC and would advocate on behalf of ratepayers to achieve the lowest possible rates and to ensure safe and reliable service.

The SFPUC is our largest, wealthiest and most powerful commission overseeing an annual budget of $677 million and a tenyear capital plan program of over $7 billion. The SFPUC is responsible for the Hetch Hetchy rebuild, the proposed waste water master plan, the San Francisco West side recycled water project, and the solar incentive program.

Billions of dollars are at stake and you, the ratepayer will pay the price. Previous rate increase plans have been ill-conceived, unfair and excessive. We must have an independent advocate to review rates, to ensure that the utilities' costs are shared fairly among all users, and to guarantee that ratepayers have a voice.

The Independent Ratepayer Advocate would be charged with evaluating the efficiency, equity and fiscal responsibility of all proposals, contracts, investments, program expenditures and operations put forth by the SFPUC.

The Ratepayer Advocate would have the power to obtain PUC information, hold public meetings and provide comments and recommendations on rate proposals to the SFPUC and the Board of Supervisors.

To insulate the Ratepayer Advocate from political influence, this person will be appointed by the City Administrator, not an elected official.

It is time that San Francisco ratepayers were represented by an independent voice. By supporting this proposition, you will give San Francisco residents an independent voice at the SFPUC.

Join us in voting YES on Proposition I to create an Independent Ratepayer Advocate and greater scrutiny of the SFPUC.

Supervisor Alioto-Pier
Supervisor Ammiano
Supervisor Chu
Supervisor Dufty
Supervisor Elsbernd
Supervisor McGoldrick

(No arguments against Proposition I were submitted)


San Francisco Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: January 24, 2009 10:41 PST
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://www.lwvc.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.