This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sba/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
Smart Voter
Santa Barbara County, CA November 4, 2008 Election
Measure H2008
Parcel Tax to Offset Budget Cuts
Santa Barbara High School District

2/3 Approval Required

Pass: 59747 / 71.25% Yes votes ...... 24104 / 28.75% No votes

See Also: Index of all Measures

Results as of Dec 2 1:22pm, 99.9% of Precincts Reporting (318/137)
Information shown below: Official Information | Impartial Analysis | Arguments |

To offset severe state budget cuts to our schools; protect the quality of education; enhance math, science and technology education; supplement music, arts, foreign language and theater programs at the secondary level; and restore math class size reduction; shall Santa Barbara High School District be authorized to implement a $23 annual parcel tax for four years, with an available exemption for senior citizens, with independent citizen oversight, without administrative salaries, and with every dollar staying in our local schools?

Official Sources of Information

Impartial Analysis
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY COUNTY COUNSEL SANTA BARBARA HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
MEASURE H2008

California Constitution, Article XIIIA, section 4 and the California Government Code (§ 50075 et seq.) authorize a school district, upon approval of the voters within the district by a two-thirds vote (2/3), to impose a special tax on real property parcels within the district.

This measure, if approved by two-thirds (2/3) of the voters within the Santa Barbara High School District (the "District") will authorize the District to levy a parcel tax of $23 per year against each parcel of land that lies wholly or partially within District boundaries that has been assigned an assessor's parcel number. (The full text of the measure is printed in the ballot pamphlet.)

The parcel tax is to be levied for four (4) fiscal years, without increase, beginning in the fiscal year starting July 1, 2009 and ending in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2012. The parcel tax shall be collected in the same manner and will be subject to the same interest and penalties as general property taxes and the proceeds will be deposited into a separate restricted account and shall be used only for the following specific purposes:

  • Supplementing math, science and technology education;
  • Supplementing music, arts and theater programs at the junior high level;
  • Supplementing foreign language at the secondary level;
  • Restoring ninth-grade math class sizes;
  • Providing a citizens oversight committee; and
  • Providing independent financial audits.

An annual written report will be made to the District's Board of Education (the "Board") showing (1) the amount of funds collected and expended from tax proceeds, (2) the status of any projects or programs funded by the parcel tax listed above, and (3) an annual independent financial audit. Tax proceeds shall not be spent on administrative salaries.

The oversight committee shall advise the Board on expenditures funded by the measure to ensure funds are only spent for the purposes stated in the measure by the District. Charter schools authorized by the District shall share in the tax funding, proportional to the enrollment of students from the District and will report annually to the Board and community on how tax funds have been spent.

Any owner, that is 65 years of age or older, of a parcel used solely for owner-occupied, single-family residential purposes may receive an exemption from the parcel tax by annually submitting an application by June 15 of each year to the Board in accordance with the Board's adopted rules and regulations.

A YES vote means the measure and parcel tax are APPROVED.

A NO vote means the measure and parcel tax are NOT APPROVED.

Dennis A. Marshall County Counsel

>

 
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Measure H2008 Arguments Against Measure H2008
The Santa Barbara High School District has provided a high-quality educational program for 142 years. Due to substantial state budget cuts, local schools need supplemental local tax dollars to fund programs that provide our students with the highest quality education. Measure H2008 will provide a ` stable, consistent, locally controlled funding source.

The $23 per.year investment equals about 6 cents per day toward the education of over 10,000 students in the. Santa Barbara High School District.

Measure H2008 will allow the. Santa Barbara High School District to:

  • Supplement math, science, and technology education;
  • Enhance music, art, and theater programs at the junior high school level;
  • Supplement secondary foreign language courses;
  • Restore ninth-grade math class sizes.

Measure H2O08 will improve the Santa Barbara High School District by:

  • Enhancing math, science, foreign language, and technology education programs, providing the competitive edge our students need to succeed beyond high school.
  • Maintaining high-quality music, arts, and theater programs which bring together students with diverse backgrounds and offer positive opportunities for at-risk youth.
  • Enhancing rigorous standards-based instruction and best teaching practices for student achievement.
  • Providing support to all junior and senior high schools.

Measure H2008 protects taxpayers by:

  • Requiring that all funds be used locally to improve the Santa Barbara High School District.
  • Creating an independent citizen oversight committee.
  • Requiring annual reporting on expenditures and annual independent financial audits.
  • Requiring compliance with accountability measures as determined by law.
  • Expiring in four years unless reauthorized by voters.
  • Providing an exemption from the measure for senior citizens, when requested.

Measure H2008 is an essential investment in public education and in our community; quality public schools enhance property values.

Please join us in investing in the future of our children.

Larry Crandell, Community Volunteer

Michael Bennett, Mayor, CIty of Goleta

Jean Blois, Councilmember, City of Goleta

Lanny Ebenstein, Former Trustee, SB High School District

Claire VanBlaricum, Former Trustee, SB High School District

Rebuttal to Arguments For
Tax and spend bureaucrats always claim the sky is falling unless you give them more money. This is followed by promises that are seldom kept. Why does the district need a parcel tax to fill cuts in the classrooms, while squandering money elsewhere?

If education is their priority then why has the district done the following?

Created a position of Deputy Superintendent, salary $186,000 per year, instead of funding your child's music program? Built pools that can only be heated, filtered, and lit by cutting your school's science or art program? Promoted increased nighttime stadium lit activities, vastly increasing energy costs, rather than funding technology programs? Bloated administrative salaries while cutting language programs?

Why Vote NO?

The Santa Barbara School District has not managed your tax dollars well. Measure H is so vague that any use of the money could be justified. The funds are spread across so many programs as to be ineffective. Parcel taxation is as unreliable as a funding source as the state process. The senior exemption could reduce the revenue by 20%.

Why are academic programs always cut first? It is time to demand that education be our highest priority!

Bring change by Voting No on H2008!

If the district wants tax money, let them specify the programs, amounts and sites where the monies will be spent. You are free to donate to your favorite teacher or program, but Vote No on Measure H!

Carmen L. Rouse

Alwyn N. Hartnett

Richard A. Foster

Dolores L. Hartnett

Harry S. Rouse

Taxpayers should vote NO on H. The Santa Barbara School District has a horrible record of delivering what they promise to do. Secondly, they have had years of chaotic, revolving door leadership. Thirdly, if this passes they will be back in four years demanding even more money while threatening to terminate your favorite programs.

How many annual budget fiascos have we seen? Yet administrative salaries have skyrocketed. In 2000, the Superintendent's salary was $126,796. This year.it is $200,566, an increase of $73,770. Yet, they lay off teachers!

Bond Measure V's stated purpose was "To repair and upgrade every school in the Santa Barbara High School District and achieve facility parity, replace old portables." Yet, $100,000-000 later Santa Barbara High hasn't had a functioning cafeteria for two years! Instead of parity, they built three different sized pools, which we not even mentioned on the ballot, and they never replaced a single portable!"

Bond oversight doesn't help. At the 4/4/2006 Measure V Bond oversight meeting, a member complained of a $2.2 million dollar difference between school board and bond committee reports. He stated, "These (financial) statements will make great anti-bond campaign material!" Indeed, how can we expect them to do any better with a parcel tax?

How will it be spent? At the 6/24/09 Board meeting Dn Sarvis said the elected board would not determine how the money was spent. A board member suggested that a parcel tax would free up monies for the general fund. The only way it could do that would be to strip existing funding from one program and replace it with parcel tax money.

Schools need money, but the public should be able to trust the district. They must earn our trust by proving themselves reliable, and competent before asking for our tax dollars.

Carmen L. Rouse

Alwyn N. Hartnett

Richard A. Foster

Dolores L. Hartnett

Harry S. Rouse

Rebuttal to Arguments Against
As a community, we should invest in our local schools. State funding simply does not provide local control of local tax dollars. Measure H restores local control by requiring the funds raised be used for specific programs detailed in the ballot measure.

Measure H2008 would result in:

  • New junior high electives in music, theatre arts, and foreign languages

  • New senior high electives in foreign languages

  • Acquisition and repair of musical instruments

  • 9th grade class size reduction in math to twenty students to one teacher

  • Improvements in science and technology

The $23 per parcel tax would be for 4 years. It would expire at that time, and any continuing parcel assessment would require a new vote of the people. This is the strongest guarantee that funds will be spent as intended.

At a time when gangs are of concern and when young people need more to do, there are few more effective and worthwhile expenditures than $23 per year to allow substantial improvements and additions to our junior and senior high educational program. No parcel would be taxed more than $23. There would be an exemption for senior citizens who requested it.

Santa Barbara, Goleta, and Montecito have traditionally had excellent public junior highs and high schools. Measure H2008 will enable this tradition of excellence to continue.

Please join with us in voting for Measure H2008. Support Measure H2008 and invest in our future while restoring local control of our tax dollars.

YES ON H2008!

Lois Capps, Member of Congress

Salud Carbajal, First District Supervisor, SB County

Dale Francisco, City of Santa Barbara Council Member

Dale Bugay, REgent Emeritus, University of California

Peter MacDonald, Past President, Santa Barbara City College


Santa Barbara Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: January 24, 2009 10:38 PST
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://www.lwvc.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.