This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/alm/ for current information.
Alameda County, CA November 4, 2008 Election
Smart Voter

What do We do about Rising Crime in Fremont?

By Vinnie Bacon

Candidate for Councilmember; City of Fremont

This information is provided by the candidate
When the City keeps approving development that doesn't pay its way, its no surprise that our crime rate is going up.
Crime has been increasing in Fremont + violent crime (murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault) last year was up 18% per capita since 2005 while for the nation as a whole violent crime per capita only went up 0.5% during the same period. Also during this period, burglaries were up 30%. [1]

Why has crime increased so much in Fremont? While there are no simple answers to why crimes happen, an important reason is likely to be city budget cuts. Police services and other city programs that address crime and blight have been cut way back in recent years.

At a recent community meeting, Captain Robert Nelson said that there was a significant cut to police staffing in 2001 and Fremont has one of the lowest ratios of police to citizens in Northern California. Only 12 to 13 officers are on duty at any given time throughout the City.

In addition, the City has cut funding to its Office of Neighborhoods, a program that was designed to prevent crime through grassroots community involvement. And there have been cuts to the City's code enforcement activities.

We are seeing more graffiti, gangs, abandoned shopping carts, and blighted properties. The police have adopted a policy of not responding to unverified burglar alarms and often have a two to three day response time to burglaries.

As I talk with people in Fremont, one of the most common concerns is that the police cannot respond very well to these issues because they only have enough resources to address serious crime. Unfortunately, when these 'nuisance' issues go un-addressed, it sends a message that we are not watching out for our city and that it's easy to get away with all kinds of negative behavior.

How did we get into this state that we are having trouble providing adequate funding to our Police Department and other basic city services? Part of the problem is that when new residential development comes to Fremont, even though this new development increases the need for police and other basic services, not enough revenue is raised to fund these increased needs. Also, any development that is done in a redevelopment area will generate the majority of its funds for the Redevelopment Agency, not to the City's General Fund. Funds from the Redevelopment Agency may not be used for police, fire, or code enforcement services.

The City tried to pass Measure L, a utility tax increase, in 2006 [2]. It was voted down by a margin of nearly 15%. While this would've helped the City pay for police and fire services, the citizens of Fremont obviously felt that the City should instead use its existing resources to adequately fund these services. Soon after the election, the City suddenly found that nearly one and a half million dollars was available in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). This news led some to suggest that one should be skeptical of the City asking to raise taxes [3].

Before the City of Fremont approves any new developments, we must investigate how these developments will pay their fair share for the police and other services they will need. We should not approve any new development that will put the City further behind on being able to adequately fund basic city services.

References
1. FBI Uniform Crime Reporting Program

http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/offenses/violent_crime/index.html
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/2007prelim/
2. Smart Voter.org Page on Measure L
http://www.smartvoter.org/2006/11/07/ca/alm/meas/L/
3. Tri-City Voice editorial, 01/09/2007
Tri-City Voice web site

Next Page: Position Paper 3

Candidate Page || Feedback to Candidate || This Contest
November 2008 Home (Ballot Lookup) || About Smart Voter


ca/alm Created from information supplied by the candidate: September 3, 2008 08:20
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.