This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/oh/state/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of Ohio

Smart Voter
Hamilton County, OH November 7, 2006 Election
Candidates Answer Questions on the Issues
Judge; Ohio State Court of Appeals; District 1; 6 Year Term Starting 2/10/07


The questions were prepared by the League of Women Voters of Ohio and asked of all candidates for this office.     See below for questions on Qualification, Priorities, Referral of civil cases, Influence of campaign contribution, Influence of campaign contributions

Click on a name for candidate information.   See also more information about this contest.


1. What are your Qualifications for Office? (50 word limit)

Answer from Patrick Dinkelacker:

Judges must always be dedicated to the attainment of justice. Judges must be fair, work hard and be dedicated to their oath. During my years as a judge I have done my best to adhere to that conviction. The Court of Appeals is not a position to espouse a political philosophy or agenda. Judges must follow the law and interpret the law not make the law. That is a judge's duty. I have tried many cases and been involved in the daily court system for over 26 years. I believe my experience will be a benefit to the court.

Answer from James T. "Jim" O'Reilly:

Appeals courts are the last stop for justice when mistakes are made. Appeals judges must be real experts on statutory and constitutional law. My 25 years teaching law, 32 books and U.S. Supreme Court recognition as an expert prepared me for a fair and intelligent evaluation of each appeal.


2. What plans do you have to address your top three priorities? (100 word limit)

Answer from James T. "Jim" O'Reilly:

Professionals should survey why this county's courts aren't accepted in all our communities as being fair, user-friendly public servants. The courthouse patronage system is wrong. Alienation is felt by many residents, a "them vs. us" view of the insider ways of operating our courthouse. Experts should analyze the case assignment processes this court uses, and weigh the use of civil mediators, to improve the flow of cases. We must improve the depth and quality of the reasoning and timeliness of appeals. Why not hire the best and brightest competitively, regardless of party or neighborhood loyalties?


3. What is your policy regarding the referral of civil cases to mediation, arbitration or a visiting judge? (150 word limit)

Answer from James T. "Jim" O'Reilly:

I have worked for decades as an arbitrator and have written official opinions about disputes, e.g. Hamilton County Sheriffs' deputies labor disputes with the county. I am a strong advocate for the benefits of resolving disputes fairly and simply. Costs are saved, results are faster, and outcomes are more tailored to satisfy each side. I support reducing trial court costs and caseloads by using this court's appellate powers to confirm the prudent use of the mediation and arbitration alternatives. I favor experimenting with early mediation of civil appeals to seek early settlement where possible. No system is perfect for all cases, but it makes sense to try new ways to save the public's tax dollars, while enhancing the impression that this county's court system actually cares for the citizenry and their needs for fair and prompt justice. Residents want intelligent improvements in our system, not just today's status quo.


4. Four out of five (83%) Ohio voters believe that campaign contributions influence judges and candidates, according to a 2002 LWVO survey. Specifically, what do you recommend that Ohio do to reduce this perceived threat to judicial independence? (150 words)

(No candidates submitted answers to this question)


5. Four out of five (83%) Ohio voters believe that campaign contributions influence judges and candidates, according to a 2002 LWVO survey. Specifically, what do you recommend that Ohio do to reduce this perceived threat to judicial independence? (150 words)

(No candidates submitted answers to this question)


Responses to questions asked of each candidate are reproduced as submitted to the League.  Candidates' statements are presented as submitted. 150 Word limits apply for each question. Direct references to opponents are not permitted.

The order of the candidates is random and changes daily. Candidates who did not respond are not listed on this page.


This Contest || Home (Ballot Lookup) || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: January 4, 2007 09:48 PST
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.