This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sm/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
Smart Voter
San Mateo County, CA November 7, 2006 Election
Measure H
Burlingame Flood Protection and Safety Measure
City of Burlingame

Bond Measure - 2/3 Approval Required

Fail: 5,765 / 64.0% Yes votes ...... 3,247 / 36.0% No votes

See Also: Index of all Measures

Results as of Jan 4 9:41am, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (23/23)
Information shown below: Official Information | Arguments |

To safeguard Burlingame residents, homes and businesses, shall the City of Burlingame be authorized to issue $37,000,000 in bonds to improve aging and undercapacity flood control infrastructure; and for seismic stability, disabled access, safety, security, fire protection, ventilation, and disaster preparedness improvements in existing City buildings, shall the City be authorized to issue $7,000,000 in bonds; with all expenditures monitored by a citizens' oversight committee with annual independent audits?

Official Sources of Information
  Official Information

Official Information: http://www.burlingame.org
Partisan Information

In Favor of Measure H: http://www.protectburlingame.org/

Against Measure H: http://www.againstmeasureh.com
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Measure H Arguments Against Measure H
ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE H

Measure H, a $44 million bond issue on Burlingame 's ballot, will enable the city to improve the safety of its residents and businesses.

Burlingame's flood protection system is 75 years old and rapidly deteriorating. Flooding of homes and businesses will continue until the system is fixed. A total of $37 million will be spent on a citywide program to replace aging levees, pipes and pumps to prevent the future risk of floodwater damage. With limited available funding, the city has completed some local flood control improvements but cannot keep up with the accelerating deterioration. Without new storm drains, sewers will fill with rainwater, causing pollutants to overflow into the creeks and bay and subjecting the city to State-imposed fines of up to $10,000 a day. Flooded streets will impact emergency vehicle access during storms. Performing the work now will save the city from ever-increasing maintenance and capital replacement costs and provide long-lasting flood control that is far superior to the current system.

In addition, $7 million will be spent on critical safety and public access improvements to the police station, fire stations and several other city buildings. The measure funds disaster preparedness improvements at the police station and earthquake safety retrofits at City Hall and the Recreation Center . Funds will be used to perform only essential safety work and will not be used for new buildings or additions.

All of these projects are on Burlingame 's list of critically needed capital improvements and are supported by extensive engineering studies. This is the first time in over 75 years that the City of Burlingame has submitted a ballot measure asking the voters for new revenues to invest in capital improvements. For more information, go to http://www.burlingame.org or call 558-7235.

Join us and vote YES on Measure H.

Rebuttal to Arguments For
Join us and vote NO on Measure H.

We dispute the fairness of Measure H. The run-up in property values over the past decade has resulted in a tax base skewed against new property owners. This measure would create a greater disparity between residents.

Measure H funds the flood control bond based solely on property tax assessments + limited by Proposition 13. The proponents of Measure H could have proposed a parcel tax, or other equitable funding approaches. Instead, the proponents hope that you won't see Measure H for what it really is + an unequal taxation against Burlingame 's residents.

Before Burlingame's civic leaders incur a liability exceeding $1,500 for every man, woman, and child in this city, they need to review how the current tax money is being spent--as well as ways to more fairly fund new investments in city infrastructure.

If we had to wait 75 years for a vote on funding infrastructure improvements, we can wait a little longer for a more equitable bill than this one. Vote NO on Measure H.

Burlingame residents BEWARE!!! City residents that benefit from equal services should pay equally. This will not happen if this bond measure passes. Homeowners and business owners that purchased property in Burlingame in the last 5-7 years will likely pay $500- 1000 more per year for the next 20-40 years.

BEWARE, this is not a flat parcel tax. Newer city residents will pay a disproportionate amount of the tax and that is UNFAIR!!!

BEWARE, there is NO CAP on the interest rate you will pay as the bonds will be issued over the next 5-7 years. Higher interest rates will drive your payments even higher for the 30-40 year life of the bond!!!

BEWARE, commercial property owners will be forced to pass tax costs on to local businesses. This will then be passed on to consumers with higher costs of goods and services purchased in Burlingame . This may further jeopardize local business viability.

BEWARE, rental property owners will be forced to pass higher property tax costs on to apartment renters. This will make Burlingame rentals even more unaffordable.

This hugely disproportionate tax for the city's storm drainage system will be shouldered by newer homeowners and is the WRONG way to levy this tax. We urge you to vote NO on this UNEQUAL and UNFAIR bond measure!

Rebuttal to Arguments Against
Measure H will ensure the safety of our community and the value of your property. Flooding will continue until the system is improved.

Because Measure H finances storm protection and building safety improvements based on assessed (NOT appraised) property values, the majority of residential property owners would pay less than $127 annually, or about $11 per month. A flat tax is less fair. For example, a large hotel and a one-bedroom condominium would be charged the same amount: $339 per year. In fact, over 90 percent of all residential properties would pay more with a flat tax than under Measure H. You can determine your payment by going to http://www.burlingame.org and clicking on "Projected Bond Measure Tax."

The financing method in Measure H was purposely chosen because it conforms with Proposition 13, which voters approved in 1978 as being the preferred way to calculate property tax. Property owners on fixed incomes who bought their homes years ago rely on this method to keep taxes affordable.

Measure H benefits all property owners, no matter when they purchased their homes or businesses. Having a financially sound plan to replace aging infrastructure improves the quality of life for Burlingame citizens and preserves property values for everyone. Recent home buyers in particular have a substantial investment that will be safeguarded with Measure H funded flood protection improvements.

To ensure that Burlingame continues as a fiscally responsible, well-maintained city, please vote YES on Measure H.


San Mateo Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: January 4, 2007 09:42 PST
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://www.lwvc.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.