This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/ed/ for current information.
El Dorado County, CA June 6, 2006 Election
Smart Voter

Traffic Management

By Al Vargas

Candidate for County Supervisor; County of El Dorado; Supervisorial District 4

This information is provided by the candidate
Every weekday, nearly half of El Dorado Co residents migrate down the hill to their jobs. With the growth that has taken place and the explosive growth that is coming, no single factor has the potential to degrade the quality of life for El Dorado Co. residents that traffic congestion. The key to managing traffic congestion is transportation planning through mass transit. I offer a plan of short, near, and long-term measures
For the past 12 years I have commuted down Highway 50. I know what we need to do to fix traffic congestion. The County is poised to grow in a big way. Our neighbors are growing just as fast. The Douglas- Sunrise project and development south of Highway 50 in Folsom alone will add 33,000 houses. The question is then how to manage growth to maintain our quality of life. The Board of Supervisors is already reneging on their promise to "fix traffic" (Measure B) as they are not collecting adequate traffic impact fees from developers to accommodate the new residents.

My vision for an efficient mass transit system involves short and long-term actions:

SHORT-TERM ACTIONS

  • Collect adequate traffic impact fees to pay for infrastructure to accommodate new residents.
  • Reduce bus fares by providing fair share of the sales tax revenues to the commuter service.
  • Tap into County capital improvement funds to purchase new buses and subsidize service.
  • Improve commuter bus service by expanding parking at Park and Rides, providing for punctual bus service, and expanding service to downtown Sac and high employment areas in Sac.

The commuter bus service has been neglected. Parking facilities are not maintained. There is inadequate parking, buses are crowed and uncomfortable and they are frequently late. All this discourages potentially bus riders from riding the bus.

With gasoline prices at the current level and which are predicted to remain at this level, creates an opportunity to expand the commuter bus service system. This requires that bus service be expanded beyond downtown Sacramento to other high density employment areas in Sacramento. It also requires that the bus service be efficient and reasonably priced.

There are two sources of revenues for bus service in El Dorado Co, fares and a share of the sales tax revenues. Most services in El Dorado Co. such as the in-county bus routes, the Dial a Ride, etc. only contribute 5 to 7% of their revenues from fares. The Sacramento commuter service contributes 66%. The current transit board raised fares to match the highest fares in the region, which was Folsom at the time. The Folsom commuter service no longer exists leaving El Dorado Transit as the highest fares in the region. El Dorado Transit monthly commuter pass is $144. Compare that with Roseville and Yolo which are $55 and $60, respectively.

NEAR AND LONG-TERM

  • Work on a regional basis to obtain infrastructure bond funding for light rail service to Bidwell and Highway 50 and to add a third rail for express service.
  • Work on a regional basis to bring a heavier rail system and integrate it with the light rail system.

El Dorado Co. needs to work on a regional basis to develop a master transportation plan that in the near term brings a light rail branch to Highway 50 and Bidwell or as far up the hill as the rail system can travel. A large inter-modal system could be developed here where commuter buses could frequently transport commuters here. Simultaneously, a third rail needs to be installed for express service to high destination areas in Sacramento (e.g. Watt Avenue, downtown Sacramento). In the long-term, we need to develop a heavy rail system, in the style of BART to higher reaches of El Dorado Co. This rail system would be integrated with the light rail system.

Invested dollar for dollar, a rail system is more cost-effective at transporting commuters than highway lanes. We only need to look to other areas that have relied primarily on highways to see were that has gotten them (Los Angeles, Houston, etc.).

Next Page: Position Paper 2

Candidate Page || This Contest
June 2006 Home (Ballot Lookup) || About Smart Voter


ca/ed Created from information supplied by the candidate: June 4, 2006 08:22
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.