This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/state/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
Smart Voter
State of California November 8, 2005 Election
Proposition 80
Electric Service Providers. Regulation
State of California

Initiative Statute - Majority Approval Required

Fail: 2,532,094 / 34.4% Yes votes ...... 4,825,010 / 65.6% No votes

See Also: Index of all Propositions

Results as of Nov 23 4:01pm, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (17726/17726)
Information shown below: Summary | Fiscal Impact | Yes/No Meaning | Official Information | Arguments |

Should the state expand its regulation of the electric industry?

Summary Prepared by the State Attorney General:
Subjects electric service providers to regulation by California Public Utilities Commission. Restricts electricity customers' ability to switch from private utilities to other providers. Requires all retail electric sellers to increase renewable energy resource procurement by 2010.

Fiscal Impact from the Legislative Analyst:
Potential annual administrative costs ranging from negligible to $4 million, paid by fees. Unknown net impact on state and local costs and revenues from uncertain impact on electricity rates.

Meaning of Voting Yes/No
A YES vote on this measure means:
The Public Utilities Commission (PUC) would have broadened authority to regulate electric service providers. The PUC's current policies related to the electricity procurement process, resource adequacy requirements, and the renewables portfolio standard would be put into law. Small electricity customers in existing buildings could not be required to accept time-differentiated electricity rates without their consent. The current prohibition on new "direct access" for electricity service would be continued beyond 2015.

A NO vote on this measure means:
The PUC would not have broadened authority to regulate electric service providers. The PUC's current policies related to the electricity procurement process, resource adequacy requirements, and the renewables portfolio standard would not be put into law. The PUC would determine whether and how small electricity customers in existing buildings would be required to have time-differentiated electricity service. New "direct access" for electricity service would continue to be prohibited until 2015, after which time it would be allowed.

Official Sources of Information
Arguments Submitted to the Secretary of State

Summary of Arguments FOR Proposition 80:
Vote YES to make sure we NEVER AGAIN face the blackouts and market manipulation caused by deregulation. Proposition 80 guarantees a stable and reliable electric system with ample supplies of clean, affordable power and increased use of renewable resources. Vote YES for lower rates, environmental protection, and no more deregulation.

Full Text of Argument In Favor, Rebuttal

Summary of Arguments AGAINST Proposition 80:
Proposition 80 is a high-risk, anticonsumer, antienvironmental approach to California's energy future. It limits green energy from solar and geothermal resources. This confusing measure won't lower electric bills, won't prevent blackouts, and eliminates consumer choice. Complex energy policy should be developed with public hearings, not through the initiative process.

Full Text of Argument Against, Rebuttal

Contact FOR Proposition 80:
Mindy Spatt The Utility Reform Network (TURN)
711 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 350
San Francisco, CA 94102
415) 929-8876
info@yesonproposition80.com
http://www.yesonproposition80.com

Contact AGAINST Proposition 80:
Bob Pence
Californians for Reliable Electricity
1717 I Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 551-2513
http://www.noprop80.com

  Official Information

Secretary of State

Legislative Analysts's Office Campaign Finance Information

Secretary of State

  • Cal-Access - how much money is being raised and spent on Prop 80
Around the Capitol - Election Track California Voter Foundation Nonpartisan Information

League of Women Voters - Analysis

Easy Voter Guide Other organizations League of Women Voters - Background Events

LWV Pros & Cons Public Meetings

  • Come to a meeting in your community where League experts discuss all state ballot propositions giving a nonpartisan analysis. Consult your Smart Voter county page for dates, times and locations. Meetings are usually in October.
TV & Radio Online Broadcasts

League of Women Voters

KPCC 89.3 FM (Public Radio, Pasadena) KQED 88.5 FM (Public Radio, San Francisco) LA36 TV News and Analysis

News Websites with special coverage

Google News Search Message to News Reporters

If you use our website for your research, please encourage your readers to go to smartvoter.org!
Suggest a link related to Proposition 80
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.


California Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: January 28, 2006 14:49 PST
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://www.lwvc.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.