Butler, Preble, Darke, Miami, Shelby, Mercer Counties, OH November 7, 2000 Election
Smart Voter

Campaign Finance Reform

By David R. Shock

Candidate for United States Representative; District 8

This information is provided by the candidate
I support campaign finance reform measures that increase participation in the American political system.
I support campaign finance reform that promotes openness in the political process. However, I oppose the proposed McCain-Feingold reforms. These "reforms" would have very negative consequences for political parties, especially for third parties. The McCain-Feingold reforms seek to abolish the "soft money" loophole. Currently, individuals may give unlimited amounts of money to political parties. I view this as a good thing. Political parties have traditionally been the backbone of democracy in this country. Parties are the organizations that unite many diverse groups together into large coalitions to win elections. Strong parties promote compromise and negotiation among many different interest groups in our society. By restricting soft money contributions to parties, the McCain-Feingold plan would significantly weaken the role of parties in our political system. Individual candidates would be left to fend for themselves. Instead of relying on parties for money, individual candidates would go directly to PACs and interest groups. I believe that this does not enhance representation in our democracy. If parties lose their ability to raise funds for candidates, then our democracy will witness the decline of parties as significant players in politics. This will likely lead to more candidate-centered politics focused around candidates raising money directly from powerful interest groups.

In addition, I oppose the proposed campaign finance reforms because they discriminate against third parties in the American political system. These parties have difficulty raising large sums of money from many different contributors. Often times, for a third party to get started, an individual needs to infuse a large sum of money to help to party develop. Third parties, unlike the Democrats and Republicans, must petition to get on the ballot. The petitioning process is very expensive. Restricting large donations by individuals to third parties for these party-building activities would cripple third party efforts and virtually guarantee the continued hegemony of the Democrats and Republicans. In short, the McCain-Feingold plan would result in third parties not being able to organize. As a result, voters would be left with only a choice between Republicans and Democrats at election time.

I favor the following changes to current campaign finance laws to strengthen parties and to enhance representation in our democracy:

1. Make contributions to political parties tax deductible. Since parties play such an essential role in democracy, I believe that this is appropriate. Other countries, such as Canada, allow individuals to deduct contributions made to parties from their taxes. This would promote the strengthening of parties in this country.

2. Peg campaign contribution limits to the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The current restrictions on contributions were written in the late 1970s. There is a $2000 limit per election cycle on individual contributions to candidates and a $20,000 limit on contributions to parties. Since the 1970s, inflation has dramatically reduced the buying power of $2000. $2000 in 1976 dollars equals the buying power of roughly $5800 dollars today. In short, $2000 today means a lot less than it did in the 1970s. I support adjusting the contribution limits biennially to reflect changes in the CPI.

3. End "political welfare" for the Democrats and Republicans. Currently, taxpayers are forced to pay for the national conventions and presidential campaigns of the two major parties. This is unfair to members of third parties. Our tax dollars are being used against us. The Republicans and Democrats should be able to finance their own conventions. Libertarians hold successful self-financed national conventions every two years without any taxpayer funds.

Candidate Page || Feedback to Candidate || This Contest
November 2000 Home (Ballot Lookup) || About Smart Voter


oh/state Created from information supplied by the candidate: September 19, 2000 13:04
Smart Voter 2000 <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © 2000 League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.