15,906 / 73.6% Yes votes ...... 5,706 / 26.4% No votes

See Also: Index of all Measures

Article XIIIB established the appropriations limit for most cities, counties, and special districts at the time Article XIIIB became law. Since the City of Citrus Heights ("the City") was incorporated after Article XIIIB took effect, the City's appropriations limit is established differently.

Prior to the City's incorporation, the Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission ("LAFCO") set a provisional appropriations limit for the City for fiscal year 1997-98 at twenty-one million dollars ($21,000,000). State law imposes on the City Council a duty to (1) determine a proposed permanent appropriations limit to replace the provisional appropriations limit set by LAFCO and (2) to submit the proposed permanent appropriations limit to the voters at the first municipal election held after the City's first full fiscal year of operation.

State law requires the permanent appropriations limit for a city incorporated after January 1, 1990, to be determined by calculating the actual tax proceeds received by the city during its first full fiscal year of operation and adjusting that amount by the estimated change in the cost of living and population growth in the next full fiscal year of incorporation, and by other applicable factors. The City Council proposes a permanent appropriations limit for the City in the amount of twenty million three hundred sixteen thousand two hundred and eighty-four dollars ($20,316,284).

The proposed permanent appropriations limit will replace the provisional appropriations limit set by LAFCO. The proposed permanent appropriations limit does not increase fees, taxes, and assessments paid by City residents or businesses.

Commencing with fiscal year 1998-99 and continuing thereafter for subsequent fiscal years, the City Council will set the City's appropriations limit using the permanent appropriations limit set at the November 3, 1998, election. The City Council will adjust annually the appropriations limit by the factors specified in State law.

s/William Hughes
Mayor

(No arguments against Measure O were submitted)