Fresno County, CA November 3, 1998 General
Smart Voter

Political Philosophy for Tom Perch

Candidate for
Supervisor; Fresno County; District 4


This information is provided by the candidate

Tom Perch Election Statement

I want integrity and honesty put back into our government. I ran for this position to serve you and not the bureaucracy. Holding the bureaucrats accountable and helping folks in this district and even other districts is the most satisfying part of being your supervisor. I believe your government is here to serve you, not to make you their servant. I will never stop fighting on this issue.

Of course, fighting hard for you does not make the elitist self interest groups happy with me. They say I am hard to get along with but those I represent say I fight successfully for them. It simply means they are not winning and that you the public are winning for a change. But, it also means that those special interests will be out strong to remove me from being able to serve you.

As some of you will recall, I tried to remove public law 818.8-a law that allows government employees and elected officials to intentionally decieve you and not be accountable. You and I know we need to remove that law and many others like it. I tried, but not one other board member supported its removal. But I assure you, I haven't given up.

Many of you will remember my tough stands to make life tough on criminals. While I proposed Swamp coolers, Jail Bisquets, Pedal power to heat showers, bunk beds, and hot bunking others on the board were pushing for Air Conditioned rooms (Oken)and swimming pools (Levy) for criminals. Fortunately for us, there were enough votes to stop swimming pools and air conditioned rooms for Juvenile delinquents, but now Oken and Levy are supporting my opponent. That's politics.

There are some significant differences between us, which provides voters a choice. A few of the difference are:

We had an opportunity for plentiful and inexpensive water. An average of 160,000 acre feet of water in Fresno County, called flood water, is released into the ocean due to insufficient capacity behind our dams. An opportunity to capture a portion of that flood water through recharging the ever depleting underground water supply came before our board. I voted yes, but our Board majority voted no. As a farmer I understand the importance of providing reliable, plentiful and inexpensive water, and as an engineer I understood how to do so. My opponent takes issue with my vote. Do you? If so vote for her.

Farmers are now set up for big dollar fines by the government. Rent the house you're living in to four hard working farm workers and you would be subject to tens of thousands of dollars in fines. Not only are you subject to fines, but you are liable for their actions 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Rent that same house to 15 drug addicts, or 15 welfare recipients and it is legal, no fines, and no liability. This law is unreasonably punitive to both farmers and farm workers. Moreover, it defies all common sense. I initiated action to change this law, but met resistance. Call me, 237-5755, to find out why. Vote for my opponent if you think this law is good.

Why are welfare recipients now getting almost $18 per hour? Many of us in farming experienced a labor problem this year. Welfare reform was to make a difference and it may have if welfare recipients income wasn't increased by 40%. Below is a factual example demonstrating welfare reform:

Before ReformAfter Reform
Cash$740/mo$680/mo
Rent subsidy$600/mo$600/mo
Medical & Food Stamp$300/mo$300/mo
Child Care Reimb$0$750/mo
Total$1640/mo$2330/mo

Remember, there is no tax or SS deductions on welfare pay. Based on a 40 hour week, welfare subsidy increased from $12+/hr gross to $17+/hr gross. I did not vote for this huge increase for welfare recipients. These facts can be backed up by official records, which I will provide. If this is the welfare reform you wanted, vote for my opponent.

Other differences in my voting record, based on official records

Voting Record

Each year approximately 2,500 issues are voted upon. Of those, 95% receive unanamous votes. Here is a sample of my vote on the 5% where differences existed. Hopefully, being informed on the differences will assist in casting your vote. If you don't agree with my voting record, I urge you to vote for my opponent.

P-Perch, L-Levy, O-Oken, K-Koligian, A-Arambula

P....L...O...K...A
No..Y...Y...Y...Y...-Waste Flood water into ocean rather than recharge underground
No..Y...Y...Y...Y...-Increase welfare costs/Payments to Welfare Recipients by 40%
No..Y...Y...No..Y...-Initiate Lawsuits against Cities rather than resolve differences
Y...No..No..Y...No..-Protect Williamson Act by maintaining a 20 acre minimum
No..Y...Y...No..Y...-Construct Academy Ave where Case family owns property
No..Y...Y...Y...Y...-Support the Right to Lie law (GC818.8)
No..No..Y...Y...Y...-Ignore CHP tested & selected safety tire & spend 25% more
No..Y...Y...Y...Y...-Add $100,000 more to welfare spending

No..Y...Y...Y...Y...-Pay for two health care plans for Judges.
No..Y...Y...Y...Y...-Increase Vehicle License Fees for Fresno County residents
Y...No..No..Y...Y...-Provide Crime fighting Helicopters for Rural Areas
No..Y...Y...Y...N/A.-Illegally collect & keep $780,000 of public fees

Y..Abs.No..Y...N/A.-Use Swamp coolers rather than Air conditioners at Boot Camp
No..Y...Y...Y...Y...-Increase salaries for Elected Officials by 10%
No..abs.Y...Y...Y...-Gift $1,000,000 of undergrounding to City of Fresno
No..Y...Y...No..Y...-Stop Construction of Shaw & Marks Railroad Seperation Proj

Misrepresenting issues during campaigns is all too frequent. Its sad, but there is a law (Government Code 818.8) that allows politicians and public servants to intentionally decieve the public!

Candidate Page || This Race
November 1998 Home (Ballot Lookup) || About Smart Voter


Created from information supplied by the candidate: October 25, 1998 20:33
Smart Voter '98 <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © 1998 League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.